Loading page…
Disney’s proposed purchase is not a completed takeover. Character.AI says the service remains available, but it will close if no workable bid supports continued operations.
Listen to this story
Character.AI’s Chapter 11 case will test whether a court-supervised sale can preserve the chatbot service, not simply who buys its intellectual property. Disney’s $20 million stalking-horse offer covers some assets and sets an opening benchmark; competing bids remain possible, and the company is seeking a sale of all or substantially all assets. The platform and paid subscriptions continue for now, but Character.AI says it will wind down if no actionable proposal supports continued operations.
The court filing lists estimated assets and liabilities alike at $50 million to $100 million; the sale is expected by late November or early December 2026.
Subscriptions remain active under current terms; users can export or delete data, and Character.AI says its privacy practices remain unchanged during the proceeding.
Disney’s offer is not comparable to Google’s 2024 $2.7 billion deal, which involved licensing rights and senior staff joining Google.
Character.AI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12, 2026, putting its assets up for a court-supervised sale. Disney has agreed to a $20 million opening bid for some assets, Reuters reported. The service remains available, but Character.AI says its survival depends on a workable proposal to keep it operating.
The proposed Disney transaction covers some of Character.AI’s assets, including a license to certain intellectual property. Character.AI is asking the court to approve auction rules that would make Disney the lead bidder. That designation, called a stalking-horse bid, would establish a baseline price while leaving other bidders free to offer more.
Disney’s agreement therefore does not establish that it will be the final buyer. Nor does its proposed asset purchase amount to a confirmed commitment to keep the Character.AI platform running: the company’s announcement makes continued operation conditional on an actionable proposal.
The company describes a broader goal for the bankruptcy case than the package attached to Disney’s bid. Its FAQ says it is pursuing a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. That distinction matters when reading the $20 million figure: Reuters describes an offer for some assets, not an agreed price for the entire business.
Character Technologies, the U.S.-based owner of the platform, listed estimated assets and estimated liabilities in the same range: $50 million to $100 million each, according to the court filing cited by Reuters. Character.AI expects the sale process to finish by the end of November or early December 2026.
We hope that the sale process will yield an actionable proposal that will allow continued operations of the Character.ai platform. If such a bid is unavailable, however, the platform will be wound down.
Character.AI, October 12 company update
For users, the immediate position is continuity rather than shutdown. Character.AI says all services remain accessible and that it intends to operate with minimal disruptions during the sale. Its company update also spells out what remains unchanged for subscribers and what users can do with their records.
The company also says its privacy and security practices remain unchanged and that user information continues to be protected under its Privacy Policy. Those assurances describe the current service during the proceeding, rather than a new set of data-handling terms for a future owner.
Writing in Spyglass on October 13, M.G. Siegler contrasted Disney’s proposed bid with Google’s $2.7 billion Character.AI deal in August 2024. He described that earlier agreement as including non-exclusive licensing rights and bringing co-founder Noam Shazeer and other senior staff to Google. The two figures concern different transaction packages, rather than successive prices for an identical purchase.
Siegler also points to AI-safety lawsuits following self-harm incidents and at least two suicides he describes as linked to the service. He argues that losing founders and senior talent left Character.AI less equipped to address those problems. But he acknowledges that safety issues predated the Google deal and cautions against saying that transaction caused the incidents.
Character.AI’s own explanation is broader: it cites significant legal, regulatory and operational headwinds over the past year. The company says its board reviewed alternatives before choosing a court-supervised sale, presenting the process as its best opportunity to maximize stakeholder value and preserve service. That is the board’s assessment, not a guarantee that both goals will be achieved.
Story updates
Character.AI’s $20 million asset agreement with Disney excludes user data. That does not put private conversations beyond buyers’ reach: BBC reporting published October 29 says bankruptcy filings permit a separate data sale. The distinction leaves sensitive chatbot exchanges potentially available to another buyer, with privacy experts warning that existing policies allow wide reuse.
The BBC’s Thomas Germain reports that Character.AI agreed to sell some assets to Disney while leaving user information outside that package. Court filings nevertheless allow the company to sell the data to other buyers. That is permission for a possible transaction, not confirmation that anyone has bought the conversations.
A change of owner also does not necessarily mean a clean break with the original privacy policy. Buyers generally must follow that policy’s rules, the BBC explains. But those rules can already give a purchaser considerable room to use the information. The scope of the original permissions therefore matters alongside the identity of any eventual buyer.
According to the BBC’s account of Character.AI’s privacy policy, user data can support new features, AI model training, algorithm development and profiles for targeted advertising. Calli Schroeder, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s AI and Human Rights Program, warns that a buyer could use the data for those same purposes.
When people talk to a personified bot, they often share much more personal and sensitive information,
Schroeder’s concern extends beyond account holders. People seeking advice may disclose information about friends or family, bringing people who never used Character.AI into its dataset. She gives the example of someone asking how to respond after a friend comes out as gay. The person described in the exchange need not have spoken to a chatbot at all.
Bankruptcy can also trigger exceptions to protections users thought they had. Schroeder says companies frequently list bankruptcy among circumstances in which their usual privacy promises no longer apply. Even jurisdictions with stronger privacy protections, including the European Union, still allow data sales in bankruptcy, the BBC notes.
A coalition of 40 U.S. state attorneys general has filed a notice asking the judge for child-safety and privacy protections. Melissa Jacoby, a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill law professor, cautions that the states’ leverage is limited without stronger U.S. privacy protections. Their request is not itself a guarantee that safeguards will be imposed.
Character.AI’s spokesperson told the BBC that the company is committed to working with families on safer products and has taken steps on teen safety. The spokesperson did not answer specific questions about children’s privacy.
For users concerned about stored conversations, the BBC points to deletion instructions in Character.AI’s bankruptcy announcement. Companies are not required to offer deletion in every jurisdiction, though some make it available more widely rather than operate different systems. Germain recommends prioritizing services holding particularly sensitive information, especially those a person has stopped using.
Check the service’s privacy settings for data-deletion controls.
Look in its privacy policy for instructions if the controls are not obvious.
Contact customer support if those routes do not explain how to request deletion.
bbc.comDisney required its Character.AI deal to be completed through bankruptcy because of the startup’s shrinking cash reserves and litigation risks, according to court filings described by WIRED on October 19. The arrangement moved most employees to Disney before the filing and now seeks a technology license while leaving Character.AI responsible for its legal obligations.
The financial strain was substantial. CEO Colin Adams said in an October 12 declaration that Character.AI was losing $8 million to $9 million a month. Computing alone cost about $56.1 million from January through August 2026, while monthly revenue never exceeded $5.3 million, according to Dealroom figures cited by PYMNTS.
The company had already cut expenses. Its declaration described moving the computing that generates chatbot replies to cheaper graphics-processing capacity and adapting open-weight models instead of building its own. It also reduced headcount. Advertising became another revenue source: in August, ads brought in $2.5 million, nearly matching the $2.8 million from subscriptions, according to Dealroom.
Legal exposure also constrained the search for money. Character.AI began working with an investment banker in August 2025 to find a buyer or investor. Bankruptcy filings described consistent feedback: potential backers liked the product and audience, but litigation and regulatory risks made the business unbuyable. Adams said bankruptcy would seek an agreed resolution with personal-injury claimants and investigating states while maximizing asset value for shareholders.
The filings describe two linked transactions, WIRED reported. The first took place in September, when Disney hired the majority of Character.AI’s employees, including then-CEO Karandeep Anand. Disney agreed to let some of those employees keep Character.AI operating for five months. Character.AI then filed for Chapter 11 on October 12, 2026.
The second stage is a proposed perpetual, worldwide, nonexclusive technology license. That would give Disney continuing rights to use the covered technology without making it the exclusive license holder. The package is broad, but it is not the entire consumer platform.
Included: code, documentation, frameworks and tools, including technology for safety moderation, model-training infrastructure and age prediction.
Disney has agreed to offer jobs to at least 60 Character.AI employees—the majority of its workforce—while the chatbot company’s future remains unsettled. A court filing described by TechCrunch says most recipients accepted. The employment terms add substance to Disney’s proposed bankruptcy deal, but they do not amount to a completed takeover or a promise to preserve the platform.
The hiring details, reported October 18, put numbers behind an agreement Character.AI disclosed when it entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier that week. TechCrunch attributed them to a legal filing first spotted by Bloomberg. That filing says the “vast majority” of employees who received Disney offers accepted them; it does not describe every employee as having received an offer.
The filing estimates total annual compensation for the employees covered by the offers at $60 million. That is an annual pay estimate, separate from the $20 million consideration in the proposed asset-and-licensing agreement. The two figures describe different commitments, not a single purchase price for Character.AI.
Character.AI’s October 12 company announcement describes a narrower arrangement than an outright acquisition. Disney Worldwide Services, a Disney affiliate, agreed to serve as the stalking-horse bidder: the opening bidder whose proposed deal can be challenged by higher or better offers during the court-supervised sale process.
Disney would receive a non-exclusive, perpetual license to certain Character.AI intellectual property, along with certain company claims. The license is not described as exclusive ownership of the technology.
The consideration includes $20 million and transition services supplied through former Character.AI employees hired by Disney. Those services are intended to help operate the platform safely for a limited period and support the sale process.
The bankruptcy case has a broader remit than that particular Disney package. Character Technologies, the company behind Character.AI, said it was seeking a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. It asked the court to approve bidding procedures and designate Disney as the stalking-horse purchaser for certain assets.
Character.AI says it expects to keep the platform operating with minimal service disruption during the sale. But its announcement makes the longer-term outcome conditional: if the process does not produce a purchase that provides for continued operation, the platform will be wound down. Disney’s transition services are temporary support, not an announced commitment to run Character.AI indefinitely.
Loading discussion...
Not included in the listed intellectual property: users’ data or Character.AI’s website.
Other bidders can compete for the license. To preserve that process, Disney agreed to let a winning rival interview and potentially hire up to 80 percent of certain employees it had recruited from Character.AI. Disney can choose which employees are eligible. If it loses the auction, Disney would recover its deposit and receive a breakup fee.
Disney also prepared a proposed court order stating that the transaction should not be treated as a merger. Under that draft, Character.AI would retain responsibility for its liabilities and legal claims. Those are requested protections, not a final court ruling. Disney declined to comment to WIRED; Character.AI referred questions about whether bankruptcy was a condition of the deal to Disney.
John Newman, a University of Memphis law professor and former Federal Trade Commission competition official, questioned whether existing safeguards could address the arrangement. He told WIRED that corporate law had long dealt with buyers seeking assets without liabilities, but that the Disney–Character.AI structure was unusually difficult for those safeguards to cover.
Forty state attorneys general have asked the bankruptcy court to require privacy and safety protections in any sale. Their investigations allege serious chatbot-safety failures involving minors. Character.AI told WIRED that the states’ filing did not accurately portray the platform’s safety. The states reserve the right to challenge a bankruptcy plan, leaving a potential dispute over the proposed transaction and its protections.
Character.AI expects the court-supervised sale to finish by late November or early December. It says the platform will wind down if no buyer keeps it running. Disney’s proposed license therefore does not itself settle the service’s future: acquiring technology rights and financing continued operation remain different outcomes.
The company also sought court approval for measures allowing it to continue paying wages and benefits, honor commitments to users, and meet obligations to vendors and partners incurred after the filing. Those requests concern keeping the business functioning through bankruptcy; they are not guarantees about the outcome of the auction.
The filing describes a business constrained by high costs, potential litigation-related liabilities and regulatory engagement, despite a large, engaged user base. That account places the staffing agreement inside a distressed sale, rather than a standalone expansion of the chatbot business. Character.AI’s proposed timetable anticipates completing the sale process and closing resulting transactions in late November or early December 2026.
Join the conversation
Explain whether continued access is enough to justify continued billing.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.