Editorial standards

Prefer primary documents for product specifications, financing terms, policy text, dates, and direct statements.

Use independent reporting to add context, challenge claims, and distinguish an announcement from its practical significance.

Attribute material claims and preserve links to supporting sources whenever the format allows.

Label estimates, rumors, disputed claims, and incomplete information instead of presenting them as settled fact.

Do not treat a press release, social post, or high engagement as proof of importance or accuracy on its own.

Generated language must remain grounded in available source material; missing facts should stay missing.

AI output is not treated as a source. The underlying reporting, document, data, or direct statement is the source.

We do not create artificial author personas to imply firsthand reporting or human authorship that did not occur.

Automation may make mistakes. Confidence scores, provenance, deduplication, and quality thresholds reduce risk but do not eliminate it.

Readers can challenge any claim through the correction process regardless of how the content was prepared.

Higher-risk coverage includes allegations, legal disputes, safety incidents, policy interpretation, market-moving claims, sensitive personal information, and contested facts.

Embargo acceptance, material corrections, sponsorship disclosures, and exceptions to normal standards require human judgment.

Routine structured updates may move through automated source, duplication, confidence, and completeness checks before publication.

An editor may delay, narrow, relabel, update, or decline coverage when the available evidence does not support a responsible story.

An Exclusive label requires human verification that Superpower Daily obtained or independently established previously unreported material through a direct interview, original tip, private document, original dataset, accepted embargo, or original investigation. We do not inherit another publisher's exclusivity claim or infer the label from a headline.

Correction requests should identify the article, disputed statement, proposed correction, and reliable supporting evidence.

Material corrections should be clearly noted on the story; minor spelling, formatting, or style fixes may be made without a notice.

Updates should not silently reverse the original meaning. When context materially changes, the story should explain what changed.

Content is not removed merely because a subject dislikes accurate coverage. Removal may be considered for legal, privacy, safety, or exceptional fairness reasons.

Potential inputs include unique readers, active reading time, completion, return reads, saves, shares, reactions, outbound clicks, and newsletter activity.

Editorial inputs may include importance, novelty, source reliability, freshness, entity relevance, duplication, and reader interests.

Minimum audience thresholds reduce volatility, and recency weighting prevents old traffic from dominating current discovery.

Sponsored stories are excluded from editorial rankings. Editors retain control over newsletter selection and ordering.

Paid placements are labeled with terms such as sponsored, advertisement, partner, or another clear disclosure.

Sponsors may provide factual materials and review their own approved creative, but they do not control independent coverage or conclusions.

A sponsorship does not guarantee favorable coverage elsewhere, suppress critical reporting, or change tracker and ranking eligibility.

We may reject creative that is misleading, unsupported, unsafe, unlawful, or inconsistent with the publication's audience and standards.

Send the organization, announcement, exact release date and time, time zone, spokesperson availability, and supporting files.

Receipt does not create an NDA, confirm acceptance, or guarantee coverage. Acceptance must be provided in writing.

Accepted embargoes govern timing, not framing. We may verify details independently, decline coverage, or choose our own conclusions.

For unusually sensitive information, contact the embargo desk and wait for written acceptance before sending confidential material.