404 Media finds Meta’s AI objection form blocks access in VPN tests
A reporter using US-based accounts could see objection options through London and Belgium connections, but could not reach the form. What determines eligibility remains unclear.
Loading page…
A reporter using US-based accounts could see objection options through London and Belgium connections, but could not reach the form. What determines eligibility remains unclear.
Listen to this story
The test exposes a gap between seeing Meta’s AI objection controls and being able to submit a request: a London or Belgium VPN connection revealed the options on a US-based account, but the form then rejected access as region-restricted. The results leave account eligibility unresolved; Samantha Cole suggested account creation location might matter, but Meta had not confirmed that rule. For users and teams tracking AI data controls, the practical takeaway is that changing connection location alone is not a reliable route to object.
On desktop, the Privacy Center flow offered separate objections for Meta AI use and third-party use of information.
Cole’s test followed Privacy Center steps to the form, where a message said it was available only in certain regions.
Instagram users bookish.sil and jenniqueart reported receiving approval emails after submitting objections; those were their accounts, not Cole’s.
Changing an internet connection’s location made Meta’s AI objection options visible, but did not make them usable. In tests published October 28, 404 Media’s Samantha Cole found that London and Belgium VPN connections exposed controls missing from her US view. Clicking through to object to Meta AI’s use of her information produced a regional-access error.
Cole’s Meta accounts are based in the United States. She used a virtual private network, or VPN, to make her connection appear to come from London, then repeated the test with Belgium.
On desktop, Cole reached a page offering two separate choices: objecting to the use of her information for Meta AI, or objecting to its use by third parties. She selected the Meta AI option. The next page said, “This form is only available to people in certain regions.”
Her desktop route ran through the account’s Privacy Center. These are the steps she described, rather than a successful workaround:
The blocked test contrasts with UK and EU users’ reported experiences. Cole cited Instagram users bookish.sil and jenniqueart, who posted walkthroughs and said they received emails from Meta approving their objections. Those are the users’ accounts of successful requests, not objections Cole completed herself.
The mobile walkthrough from bookish.sil started with Instagram’s three-line menu, continued to the Privacy Center, and used an “object” link. That led to a form asking the user to explain why they objected to their data being used. Cole’s article describes this objection process as available to people in the UK and EU for certain uses of their information.
Why Cole’s accounts were blocked remains unresolved. She suggested that eligibility might depend on where an account was created, rather than the location of its current connection, and said she had asked Meta to clarify. That explanation is a possibility she raised, not a confirmed rule governing access.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether regional rules should determine which privacy choices users get.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.