AI stocks fall as projected Texas governor result raises data-center risks
Wells Fargo estimates Texas holds 27% of planned U.S. data-center power capacity. Investors are pricing the risk of restrictions, not a newly enacted moratorium.
Loading page…
Wells Fargo estimates Texas holds 27% of planned U.S. data-center power capacity. Investors are pricing the risk of restrictions, not a newly enacted moratorium.
Listen to this story
Investors treated Gina Hinojosa’s projected defeat of Texas Governor Greg Abbott as a possible constraint on AI infrastructure, sending data-center-linked stocks lower in overnight trading into November 4. No new development limits had been announced: the selloff reflected concern about future permitting and construction, not projects already halted. Texas accounts for 27% of planned U.S. data-center power capacity, according to Wells Fargo, making the state’s policy outlook consequential for companies already facing questions about data-center spending growth.
Nasdaq-100 futures fell 0.8% as results came in, while the Dow’s decline was less than half as large.
CoreWeave fell 7% in Robinhood overnight trading; Nebius Group and Oracle each fell 4%.
The Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) was down 2% on Robinhood; these were overnight readings, not regular-session closes.
Gina Hinojosa’s support for an AI data-center moratorium became a market concern before any new restriction was announced. AI-linked stocks fell overnight into November 4 as the Democrat was projected to defeat Texas Governor Greg Abbott. CNBC linked the selling to fears that tougher development limits could disrupt a major center of the AI infrastructure buildout.
Nasdaq-100 futures fell 0.8% as election results came in, more than twice the decline in Dow futures. The Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF, which trades under XLK, was down 2% on Robinhood. Those readings captured an overnight reaction, rather than the outcome of a completed regular trading session.
Markets had already anticipated Democrats winning the House of Representatives and possibly taking the Senate, CNBC reported. Texas stood out as the result that appeared to unsettle technology investors most. The Associated Press projected Hinojosa as the winner over Abbott; her campaign had called for tougher limits on data-center development.
Wells Fargo estimates that Texas accounts for 27% of planned U.S. data-center gigawatts. This measures planned power capacity, not the number of facilities.
That concentration explains why a state election could become a concern for the national AI trade.
Scott Ladner, chief investment officer at Horizon Investments, identified that risk earlier Tuesday as results arrived. He said an Abbott defeat could move markets because it would raise a basic question: where companies could build their data centers. His assessment cast Texas as an important construction location whose availability investors could no longer take for granted.
Wells Fargo chief equity strategist Ohsung Kwon had likewise warned this week that a Democratic victory in Texas could be a “left-tail event” for the AI trade—a risk of an unusually severe downside outcome. That was a forecast about investor exposure, not a finding that projects had already been stopped by the election result.
The election reaction followed an October retreat. The Nasdaq-100 had entered correction territory by month-end as investors worried that growth in data-center spending was slowing. Those concerns covered large cloud companies as well as private AI developers OpenAI and Anthropic. The Texas result added a potential development constraint to an already unsettled investment outlook.
Optimal Advisory’s Washington policy team argued this week that the political appeal of data centers had shifted. Once promoted as economic development tools, projects had become unpopular during the midterm campaigns, the team wrote. Its expectation was that the elections would encourage state and local officials to block projects, delay them or raise their costs.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether campaign promises are enough to change your investment outlook.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.