Character.AI files for bankruptcy with Disney’s $20 million asset bid
Disney’s proposed purchase is not a completed takeover. Character.AI says the service remains available, but it will close if no workable bid supports continued operations.
Listen to this story
The audio brief
Story brief
3 key pointsCharacter.AI’s Chapter 11 case will test whether a court-supervised sale can preserve the chatbot service, not simply who buys its intellectual property. Disney’s $20 million stalking-horse offer covers some assets and sets an opening benchmark; competing bids remain possible, and the company is seeking a sale of all or substantially all assets. The platform and paid subscriptions continue for now, but Character.AI says it will wind down if no actionable proposal supports continued operations.
- 01
The court filing lists estimated assets and liabilities alike at $50 million to $100 million; the sale is expected by late November or early December 2026.
- 02
Subscriptions remain active under current terms; users can export or delete data, and Character.AI says its privacy practices remain unchanged during the proceeding.
- 03
Disney’s offer is not comparable to Google’s 2024 $2.7 billion deal, which involved licensing rights and senior staff joining Google.
Character.AI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12, 2026, putting its assets up for a court-supervised sale. Disney has agreed to a $20 million opening bid for some assets, Reuters reported. The service remains available, but Character.AI says its survival depends on a workable proposal to keep it operating.
An asset bid, not a finished takeover
The proposed Disney transaction covers some of Character.AI’s assets, including a license to certain intellectual property. Character.AI is asking the court to approve auction rules that would make Disney the lead bidder. That designation, called a stalking-horse bid, would establish a baseline price while leaving other bidders free to offer more.
Disney’s agreement therefore does not establish that it will be the final buyer. Nor does its proposed asset purchase amount to a confirmed commitment to keep the Character.AI platform running: the company’s announcement makes continued operation conditional on an actionable proposal.
The company describes a broader goal for the bankruptcy case than the package attached to Disney’s bid. Its FAQ says it is pursuing a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. That distinction matters when reading the $20 million figure: Reuters describes an offer for some assets, not an agreed price for the entire business.
Character Technologies, the U.S.-based owner of the platform, listed estimated assets and estimated liabilities in the same range: $50 million to $100 million each, according to the court filing cited by Reuters. Character.AI expects the sale process to finish by the end of November or early December 2026.
We hope that the sale process will yield an actionable proposal that will allow continued operations of the Character.ai platform. If such a bid is unavailable, however, the platform will be wound down.
Character.AI, October 12 company update
Access continues; billing does too
For users, the immediate position is continuity rather than shutdown. Character.AI says all services remain accessible and that it intends to operate with minimal disruptions during the sale. Its company update also spells out what remains unchanged for subscribers and what users can do with their records.
- Paid subscriptions remain active, and billing is unchanged for now.
- If service changes affect paid features, the company says it intends to notify subscribers in advance.
- Users can export their data or delete their accounts through the app or Character.AI’s website.
The company also says its privacy and security practices remain unchanged and that user information continues to be protected under its Privacy Policy. Those assurances describe the current service during the proceeding, rather than a new set of data-handling terms for a future owner.
The earlier Google deal was a different transaction
Writing in Spyglass on October 13, M.G. Siegler contrasted Disney’s proposed bid with Google’s $2.7 billion Character.AI deal in August 2024. He described that earlier agreement as including non-exclusive licensing rights and bringing co-founder Noam Shazeer and other senior staff to Google. The two figures concern different transaction packages, rather than successive prices for an identical purchase.
Siegler also points to AI-safety lawsuits following self-harm incidents and at least two suicides he describes as linked to the service. He argues that losing founders and senior talent left Character.AI less equipped to address those problems. But he acknowledges that safety issues predated the Google deal and cautions against saying that transaction caused the incidents.
Character.AI’s own explanation is broader: it cites significant legal, regulatory and operational headwinds over the past year. The company says its board reviewed alternatives before choosing a court-supervised sale, presenting the process as its best opportunity to maximize stakeholder value and preserve service. That is the board’s assessment, not a guarantee that both goals will be achieved.
Story updates
Latest developments
Character.AI can sell user data separately from Disney deal, BBC reports
Character.AI’s $20 million asset agreement with Disney excludes user data. That does not put private conversations beyond buyers’ reach: BBC reporting published October 29 says bankruptcy filings permit a separate data sale. The distinction leaves sensitive chatbot exchanges potentially available to another buyer, with privacy experts warning that existing policies allow wide reuse.
The BBC’s Thomas Germain reports that Character.AI agreed to sell some assets to Disney while leaving user information outside that package. Court filings nevertheless allow the company to sell the data to other buyers. That is permission for a possible transaction, not confirmation that anyone has bought the conversations.
A change of owner also does not necessarily mean a clean break with the original privacy policy. Buyers generally must follow that policy’s rules, the BBC explains. But those rules can already give a purchaser considerable room to use the information. The scope of the original permissions therefore matters alongside the identity of any eventual buyer.
According to the BBC’s account of Character.AI’s privacy policy, user data can support new features, AI model training, algorithm development and profiles for targeted advertising. Calli Schroeder, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s AI and Human Rights Program, warns that a buyer could use the data for those same purposes.
When people talk to a personified bot, they often share much more personal and sensitive information,
Schroeder’s concern extends beyond account holders. People seeking advice may disclose information about friends or family, bringing people who never used Character.AI into its dataset. She gives the example of someone asking how to respond after a friend comes out as gay. The person described in the exchange need not have spoken to a chatbot at all.
Bankruptcy can also trigger exceptions to protections users thought they had. Schroeder says companies frequently list bankruptcy among circumstances in which their usual privacy promises no longer apply. Even jurisdictions with stronger privacy protections, including the European Union, still allow data sales in bankruptcy, the BBC notes.
Sources
- blog.character.aiAn Update on Character.ai
- centraloregondaily.comCharacter.AI files for bankruptcy, agrees to sell some assets for $20 million
- spyglass.orgA Couple Elephants in the Character.AI Bankruptcy Room
Claude
Gemini
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.