Digital Realty CEO Says an AI Slowdown Would Not Stop Data-Center Demand
Andrew Power’s case rests on cloud demand, AI adoption and constrained capacity—not on an assumption that frontier models will keep advancing at today’s pace.
Loading page…
Andrew Power’s case rests on cloud demand, AI adoption and constrained capacity—not on an assumption that frontier models will keep advancing at today’s pace.
Listen to this story
Digital Realty is defending its $20 billion construction pipeline against concerns that frontier-model progress could slow. CEO Andrew Power points to cloud expansion, non-AI digital transformation, inference demand, and persistent shortages in major hubs including Northern Virginia and Singapore. The company’s pipeline has doubled from $10 billion at the end of 2023, while McKinsey estimates AI could represent 70% of global data-center capacity demand by 2030. The key risk is whether demand materializes at the ge.
Digital Realty’s construction pipeline reached $20 billion, up from $10 billion at the end of 2023.
Power says capacity remains undersupplied in Northern Virginia, Dallas, Chicago, Singapore, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.
JLL expects inference and broader AI adoption to drive growth as model-training expansion potentially moderates.
Digital Realty CEO Andrew Power is pushing back on the idea that slower frontier AI development would put the brakes on data-center construction. His argument is that the buildings underpin more than the race to train new models—and that demand for cloud services, everyday AI use and scarce capacity in major markets can keep the sector moving.
In a newly published CNBC interview, Power said warnings from Anthropic, OpenAI and xAI about slowing AI development do not mean “pencils down” for AI or the real estate supporting it. The distinction matters because AI has become a dominant source of data-center demand, even as Power says cloud computing and broader digital transformation have been overshadowed by the focus on AI.
Power’s position draws a line between the most advanced model-development work and the wider computing market. He said large cloud providers have had to choose between expanding commercial cloud businesses and assigning capacity to AI labs. That suggests capacity redirected away from new-model training could still find demand from other workloads—a company view, not a forecast of how much demand would remain under a material AI slowdown.
JLL’s Andrew Batson offered a related but different reason for resilience: inference. Training creates or improves a model; inference is the computing used when businesses and consumers put that model to work. Batson said the next several years of data-center growth will increasingly come from that adoption. He also said only one in four Americans uses AI daily, leaving room for use to grow even if new models arrive more slowly.
Power also made a more grounded case: demand is not evenly distributed. In markets including Northern Virginia, Dallas, Chicago, Singapore, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Amsterdam, he said demand has exceeded supply for several years. Customers competing for space in those locations cannot necessarily shift their workloads to any other market, he said. That local constraint is central to Digital Realty’s confidence, but it does not establish that every data-center project faces the same conditions.
The company is backing that view with a large construction commitment. Digital Realty’s development pipeline under construction totals $20 billion, double the $10 billion it reported at the end of 2023. Power said the company has broadened private-capital fundraising, pursued one-off joint ventures and positioned its balance sheet for a possible downturn. Those steps may reduce financing pressure, but they do not settle the harder question: whether customer demand will arrive at the scale and locations assumed by today’s pipeline.
The industry forecasts cited in the interview show why that question carries weight. McKinsey estimates that total data-center demand could require nearly $7 trillion in capital outlay by 2030, with AI accounting for about 70% of global capacity demand. JLL estimates the real-estate portion alone could reach $3 trillion over the next five years. They are estimates, not committed spending—but they frame the bet that infrastructure demand can broaden faster than concern about frontier-model development narrows it.
Loading discussion...
Make your case
A view to debateData-center demand can outlast frontier-model progress.
Explain what would make the buildout seem justified or excessive.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.