Fed’s Warsh sees AI wealth gains but warns of a “very bumpy” transition
Speaking at the IMF-World Bank meetings in Bangkok, Kevin Warsh separated his long-term optimism from uncertainty about AI’s immediate economic effects.
Loading page…
Speaking at the IMF-World Bank meetings in Bangkok, Kevin Warsh separated his long-term optimism from uncertainty about AI’s immediate economic effects.
Listen to this story
Warsh framed AI as a long-run source of productivity and wealth, but said the gains depend on economies using it effectively and that near-term effects on jobs and the real economy remain unknown. For businesses and policymakers, his remarks offer no expectation of a smooth adoption curve: he called the transition “very bumpy.” He also declined to signal how he would vote at the October 27–28 Fed meeting, keeping his AI outlook separate from any commitment on rates.
Warsh made the comments at a Bangkok fireside chat with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva during the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings.
He said people looking back a decade from now would judge AI “hugely consequential.”
Warsh said the global economy had “broadly conformed” to Fed expectations since September.
Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh said on October 16 that AI could make economies more productive and wealthier, but warned that the transition would be “very bumpy.” His remarks in Bangkok paired a positive long-term outlook with uncertainty about how the technology will affect jobs and the economy in the near term.
Warsh spoke at a fireside chat with International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva during the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings. The October 16 appearance was part of the weeklong gathering in Bangkok, according to CNBC’s coverage.
His optimism carried a condition: the gains would go to economies that use AI well. He described the potential benefits in terms of productivity and wealth, tying the economic promise to effective use of the technology.
I want you to hear from me optimism, but optimism leavened by the seriousness of purpose
Kevin Warsh, Federal Reserve chairman
Warsh put the significance on a decade-long horizon. Looking back ten years from now, he said, people would judge AI “hugely consequential.” That was a statement about its eventual importance, rather than a prediction of an easy adjustment.
For the nearer term, his assessment was less settled. Warsh said AI’s effects on employment and the real economy remain unknown.
At the same appearance, Warsh said the global economy had “broadly conformed” to the Fed’s expectations since September. The central bank raised interest rates last month to a range of 3.75% to 4%, its first increase since 2023.
He declined to say what he would do at the October 27–28 meeting, telling the audience, “I don’t prejudge meetings.” A communication blackout period was due to begin later on October 16, leaving his Bangkok comments without a commitment on the next rate decision.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether that optimism builds confidence or risks understating disruption.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.