Fireworks discloses wider breach impact, including customer datasets and unfinished models
An October 24 intrusion through a cloud provider added to the damage. Self-serve dataset transfers are disabled while Fireworks investigates.
Loading page…
An October 24 intrusion through a cloud provider added to the damage. Self-serve dataset transfers are disabled while Fireworks investigates.
Listen to this story
Fireworks’ investigation has expanded the known impact of its October security incident: an intrusion at a third-party cloud provider led to access to Fireworks development machines, where an unauthorized workload exposed resource metadata and billing records, and, for some customers, portions of datasets and unfinished model weights. Fireworks says payment-card numbers were not stored and it had detected no further successful access to its customer platform after October 25, though the investigation continues. It has suspended self-serve dataset transfers for some workflows, and customers are being notified.
The cloud provider’s incident occurred October 23; Fireworks detected unauthorized activity on its development machines the following day and disclosed the broader impact on November 9, 2026.
Fireworks said Inference, Training SDK and Nexus were not affected; Training SDK remains available without training data stored at rest.
The company notified law enforcement and engaged Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42, while replacing credentials, restricting access and strengthening monitoring.
Fireworks’ October security incident reached beyond stored credentials: the AI infrastructure provider said on November 9, 2026, that account and billing information was affected too. For a limited set of accounts, the exposure also included secrets, datasets and incomplete model weights. Its security update describes another intrusion through a third-party cloud provider.
Fireworks helps businesses build and run AI models. The new disclosure widens the known scope of an incident it first addressed in an October 9 bulletin. At that point, the company said, only stored secrets—such as those used in evaluation jobs—were known to have been accessed. Its subsequent investigation uncovered impacts to additional categories of customer information.
The newly described route began outside Fireworks. A third-party cloud provider hosting its research and development machines experienced a security incident on October 23. The next day, an unauthorized party used that opening to reach Fireworks development machines and run an unauthorized workload, causing additional customer-data impact. Fireworks said it detected the activity on October 24 and immediately took remediation measures, including closing known critical vulnerabilities.
Fireworks said evidence points to links with a financially motivated cybercriminal group seeking to sell unauthorized access to large language models through illicit routing gateways. The company calls this activity LLMJacking: selling access obtained without the model account owner’s permission. That is its assessment of the attackers’ motive, rather than a publicly identified attribution to a named group.
The affected internal application provided access to several kinds of information. Fireworks listed resource metadata alongside billing records and, for certain customers, portions of datasets and incomplete model weights—the numerical values that make up a model.
Fireworks said it has not detected impact to Inference, Training SDK or Nexus, which it describes as zero data retention by default. It also said that, as of October 25, it had not detected further successful unauthorized access by the attacker on its customer platform. These are findings from an ongoing investigation, which the company cautioned may uncover additional information.
The response has changed what customers can do. Fireworks disabled self-serve dataset uploads and downloads used by Batch Inference and dataset-based training while it investigates. Training SDK remains available without training data stored at rest, the company said. Training through Fireworks Lab operates in an isolated environment with additional network and storage protection.
Fireworks notified law enforcement and brought in Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 for forensic analysis and security hardening. Its measures include replacing credentials and service accounts, removing unnecessary elevated permissions, restricting network pathways and isolating affected systems. It also tightened access to storage and analytics systems and strengthened logging and monitoring.
Some customers have already acted. Two customers told Forbes they had substantially moved their business off Fireworks’ systems. One described a series of “very bad hacks” and criticized the company’s communication about the attacks. Two other customers interviewed by Forbes said they were unaware of any Fireworks hacks. Those accounts capture different customer experiences, not a measure of how broadly the breach affected Fireworks’ customer base.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain what would make you stay or switch.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.