Policypublished

Frank Kloucek Calls for One-Year AI Data-Center Ban in South Dakota PUC Race

Kloucek says utility and water risks justify a pause; Haggar says rules passed this year already protect ratepayers and give projects individual review.

By 2 min read
Frank Kloucek Calls for One-Year AI Data-Center Ban in South Dakota PUC Race
Frank Kloucek Calls for One-Year AI Data-Center Ban in South Dakota PUC Race

Listen to this story

The audio brief

About 1:31
0:001:31
Read transcript
Frank Kloucek is proposing a one-year ban on new artificial-intelligence data centers in South Dakota, turning the state’s Public Utilities Commission race into a direct fight over who should pay for the infrastructure boom. Kloucek says a pause would give the state time to study developments elsewhere and assess possible effects on electricity, natural-gas, and water customers. His concern is that large facilities could require major investments in power generation and transmission, with some of those costs landing on South Dakotans’ energy bills. Republican nominee Don Haggar calls the proposal reckless and pandering. He supports reviewing projects individually under two laws passed earlier this year and signed by Republican Governor Larry Rhoden. Those laws allow regulators to charge companies for project reviews. They also require water providers to assess whether cooling demand fits local supplies, require annual water-use reporting, and direct electric utilities to set separate terms and recover costs fairly attributed to data centers. Local governments can still limit or prohibit projects through their own ordinances. Kloucek argues the new rules lack enforcement teeth because the water-and-electricity law adds no penalties for violations. South Dakota has small data centers, but no hyperscale facilities. Voters choose between the approaches on November third, with advance voting beginning September eighteenth. The key constraint is that lawmakers already rejected both separate moratoriums and proposed incentives, leaving the commission’s case-by-case authority—and its next interpretation—as the immediate battleground.

Story brief

3 key points

South Dakota’s Public Utilities Commission race now includes a direct fight over AI infrastructure policy. Democrat Frank Kloucek wants a one-year halt on new AI data centers, arguing the state needs time to assess impacts on electricity, natural-gas and water customers. Republican Don Haggar supports case-by-case reviews under two 2026 laws requiring cost reimbursement, water-supply assessments and separate utility...

  1. 01

    South Dakota lawmakers rejected both proposed data-center incentives and separate moratoriums earlier in 2026.

  2. 02

    The new rules let regulators charge companies for project reviews and require utilities to recover fairly attributed costs.

  3. 03

    Water providers must assess cooling demand; annual water-use reporting and local approval also apply.

Democratic Public Utilities Commission candidate Frank Kloucek is seeking a one-year ban on new AI data centers in South Dakota. Republican nominee Don Haggar calls the proposal “reckless and pandering” and says projects should be judged individually under laws passed earlier this year.

Kloucek says a pause would let the state study developments elsewhere and their possible effects on electricity, natural-gas and water customers. He argues that large data centers require major investment in power generation and transmission, and that South Dakotans should not subsidize those projects through higher energy bills.

Lawmakers passed two data-center bills earlier in 2026, and Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed them into law. Legislators rejected proposals for development incentives and separate moratoriums; a proposed incentive would have exempted data-center equipment and software purchases from sales tax.

One measure lets the commission charge data-center companies for project-related regulatory reviews. A second law requires water providers to assess whether a large facility’s cooling-water use fits local supply, while electric providers must establish separate terms and seek reimbursement for costs fairly attributed to data centers.

  • The state cannot override local ordinances that limit, prohibit or otherwise regulate data centers.
  • Haggar cites protections against shifting project costs to ratepayers, annual water-use reporting and local approval before a data center locates in a community.
  • Kloucek says the new laws “lack any teeth”; the water-and-electricity law does not add penalties for violations.

South Dakota has small data centers but no hyperscale facilities. Development supporters told lawmakers that the state is missing potential high-paying jobs and millions of dollars in additional property-tax revenue, while Kloucek’s proposal centers the possible costs to utility customers before such a project moves forward.

Haggar and Kloucek are seeking one of the commission’s three seats. The election is Nov. 3, with advance voting beginning Sept. 18; the contest will determine which candidate fills the seat being vacated by Republican Commissioner Gary Hanson, who is not seeking reelection.

Sources

  1. kotatv.comSouth Dakota utility regulator candidates clash over AI data center pause
  2. sdpb.orgDifferences in data center, AI priorities on display in PUC race