GitHub brings GPT-6.1 Terra to Copilot, including its Pro plan
GitHub positions Terra as a lower-cost option than GPT-6.1 Sol. Access is gradual, usage is metered, and organizations can control availability.
Loading page…
GitHub positions Terra as a lower-cost option than GPT-6.1 Sol. Access is gradual, usage is metered, and organizations can control availability.
Listen to this story
Terra gives Copilot users a new option for bounded agentic coding and terminal jobs, with GitHub positioning it below GPT-6.1 Sol on cost—not claiming equal performance. GitHub’s early tests reportedly found more terminal and C# tasks solved than with GPT-5.6 Terra, but provided no figures or methodology. Access is rolling out across five paid tiers; organizations can still restrict the model, and usage is billed separately at provider list rates, so plan eligibility alone does not guarantee access or determine cost.
Eligible plans are Copilot Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise.
Terra is available through the model picker across major IDEs, Copilot CLI, cloud agent, the Copilot app, github.com and GitHub Mobile on iOS and Android.
Business and Enterprise administrators control Terra through model policies; new models are enabled by default unless the global default or Terra itself is disabled.
GitHub made OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Terra generally available in Copilot on October 26, 2026, bringing another model choice to developers on five paid plans, including Copilot Pro. The rollout is gradual, so eligibility does not guarantee immediate access. GitHub pitches Terra for everyday coding and terminal work at a lower cost than GPT-6.1 Sol.
GitHub describes Terra as designed for agentic coding—work carried out by an AI coding agent—and terminal tasks. It says the model works in focused, consolidated steps on well-scoped assignments. That positioning emphasizes contained jobs rather than a claim that Terra is the right choice for every coding project.
In early testing, GitHub says Terra solved noticeably more terminal and C# coding tasks than GPT-5.6 Terra. The announcement gives no numerical result or test methodology for that comparison. It is a qualitative claim from GitHub’s testing, not a quantified measure of improvement across coding work.
The performance and cost comparisons also use different reference points: GitHub compares task completion with GPT-5.6 Terra, while its lower-cost positioning is relative to GPT-6.1 Sol. It does not claim that Terra matches Sol’s coding performance.
Eligible plans are Copilot Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise. As the rollout reaches an account, users can choose Terra through the model picker. GitHub lists access across desktop development tools, command-line and cloud-agent workflows, the web and mobile:
For company accounts, plan eligibility is only part of the access decision. Copilot Business and Enterprise administrators can manage Terra through the model policy in Copilot settings. Under default model enablement, new models are automatically enabled unless an administrator has turned off the global default or explicitly disabled Terra.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether faster access or a review first matters more.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.