GitHub Rolls Out Haiku 5.5 in Copilot for Quick Edits and Smaller Tasks
GitHub says early tests matched Sonnet 5 on many coding tasks with fewer tokens and steps. Anthropic still recommends larger models for complex coding work.
Loading page…
GitHub says early tests matched Sonnet 5 on many coding tasks with fewer tokens and steps. Anthropic still recommends larger models for complex coding work.
Listen to this story
Copilot now offers Anthropic’s Haiku 5.5 as a lower-cost option for bounded coding work, including quick edits, terminal tasks and subagent assignments; it is not positioned as a replacement for stronger models on complex agentic jobs. Anthropic lists prices of $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100,000 tokens, and estimates average running costs about 75% below Haiku 4.5. Access is still rolling out, and organization administrators can restrict the model.
GitHub announced the rollout on October 7, 2026, for Copilot Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise subscribers.
The model is available through supported IDEs, Copilot CLI, GitHub’s cloud agent and app, github.com, and GitHub Mobile; users select it from the model picker.
Anthropic reports Haiku 5.5 scored 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, versus 70.6% for Sonnet 5.5; GitHub’s early comparison was with Sonnet 5.
Quick edits and smaller coding assignments have a new model option inside GitHub Copilot. GitHub made Claude Haiku 5.5 generally available on October 7, 2026, targeting fast, high-volume work rather than only long-running jobs. Access is rolling out gradually across five paid plans, so eligible subscribers may not see it immediately.
Anthropic introduced the model the same day, positioning it for repeated, cost-sensitive work such as summaries, database queries and classification. It also describes Haiku 5.5 as a subagent—a model handling a smaller assignment within a larger coding project led by another model.
GitHub’s rollout brings that role into Copilot, where it highlights subagents, quick edits and terminal tasks. GitHub says early testing found Haiku 5.5 matched Claude Sonnet 5 on many coding tasks while using significantly fewer tokens and steps. That comparison is with Sonnet 5, not Sonnet 5.5.
Anthropic’s own results show a gap on more demanding work. It reports a 39.2% score for Haiku 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0, a test of complex command-line tasks, against 70.6% for Sonnet 5.5. The company draws a clear boundary around the smaller model’s intended use:
Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 remain better choices for complex agentic coding tasks like those measured by Terminal-Bench 4.0.
Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5 launch announcement
Eligible plans are Copilot Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise. Users select Haiku 5.5 through the model picker as the rollout reaches their accounts. Supported editors include Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Xcode and Eclipse.
The same option also reaches Copilot CLI, GitHub Copilot’s cloud agent and app, github.com, and GitHub Mobile on iOS and Android. The release therefore spans editor-based work, terminal sessions and cloud-agent assignments rather than being confined to one Copilot client.
GitHub bills the model at provider list pricing under usage-based billing. Anthropic lists input at $0.10 per million tokens and output at $0.50 for prompts up to 100,000 tokens. Above that threshold, the rates rise to $0.50 and $2.50 respectively. Tokens are the units into which the model divides content.
Those rates are 90% below Haiku 4.5 for shorter prompts and 50% below it for longer ones. Anthropic estimates average running costs fall around 75%, accounting for request sizes and a changed tokenizer that uses slightly more tokens per task. Lower token prices are not the same as identical savings on finished work.
For organizational users, availability also depends on policy. Business and Enterprise administrators can manage Haiku 5.5 in Copilot settings. New models are enabled automatically unless an administrator has turned off global default enablement or explicitly disabled this model.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether immediate access or approval first would serve your team better.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.