Google.org commits $6 million to scam training and AI defenses in Asia Pacific
The Asia Foundation and the Tech for Good Institute will receive funding for work spanning local communities, experimental defenses and policymakers.
Loading page…
The Asia Foundation and the Tech for Good Institute will receive funding for work spanning local communities, experimental defenses and policymakers.
Listen to this story
Google.org’s November 3, 2026, commitment funds planned scam-response work across community training, experimental AI defenses and policy research, rather than a single protection product. Google cited scam losses of up to $114.1 billion across parts of Asia Pacific in 2025, underscoring the scale of the problem. The work is not yet a reported outcome: the announcement gives neither the split between the two recipient organizations nor a timeline for the AI prototypes.
Google cited a UN report estimating up to $114.1 billion in 2025 scam losses across East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia and New Zealand.
The cited figure that more than 40% of ASEAN consumers experience scams measures exposure, not financial losses or the number of people the funding will reach.
The AI-powered defenses are planned prototypes in incubation, not tools reported as available to the public.
People and small businesses in Asia Pacific are the intended beneficiaries of a $6 million Google.org funding commitment to The Asia Foundation and the Tech for Good Institute. Announced November 3, 2026, the commitment backs work at the community, technology and policy levels, rather than funding only a single type of scam protection.
These are planned activities, not reported results. The announcement does not specify how the funding will be divided between the two organizations or when the prototypes might become available.
Google, citing a recent UN report, put scam losses across East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia and New Zealand at up to $114.1 billion in 2025.
Google also cited the UN report in saying more than 40% of ASEAN consumers were experiencing scams. That figure describes consumer exposure, while the dollar estimate measures financial losses. Their geographic reach differs, too: the consumer figure covers ASEAN, while the loss estimate spans East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia and New Zealand. Neither figure is a count of people or businesses the new funding will reach.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain which deserves more support and why.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.