Google says it cut errors 40-fold in a quantum state-preparation experiment
The Willow experiment achieved reported T-state logical fidelity of 99.99%. The next challenge is showing that the technique works at a scale useful for practical computing.
Loading page…
The Willow experiment achieved reported T-state logical fidelity of 99.99%. The next challenge is showing that the technique works at a scale useful for practical computing.
Listen to this story
Google’s Willow experiment moves magic-state cultivation from proposal to hardware, reporting 99.99% logical fidelity for prepared T-states and about 40 times fewer errors. The October 15, 2026 announcement also demonstrates transferring cultivated states from a distance-3 color code to a distance-5 surface code, but does not show a measured reduction in computing resources; Google says larger-scale tests are still needed. The work targets a costly fault-tolerant-computing bottleneck that Google estimates could consume up to 95% of a quantum computer’s capacity.
Equipment drift and temperature changes undermined the team’s usual benchmark, prompting new hardware controls and a technique that uses cultivation to measure itself.
Cultivation filters noisy state-preparation attempts by checking them and discarding failures before growing a retained state into a larger encoding.
The transfer between error-correction codes tests whether cultivated states survive grafting, but does not establish practical resource savings at scale.
Google Quantum AI says it has demonstrated a way to prepare crucial quantum states with about 40 times fewer errors on its Willow processor. In an October 15 research announcement, the team described turning “magic state cultivation” from a theoretical proposal into a hardware experiment aimed at reducing a major resource burden in quantum computing.
The problem starts before a quantum computer can do its useful work. To carry out the full set of operations needed for universal quantum computing, it needs special prepared states known as magic states. Creating high-quality versions protected by error correction consumes substantial resources. Each state can be used only once, so the machine must keep producing them rather than reuse a fixed supply.
Researchers have recognized that bottleneck since 2004. Google cites estimates suggesting that making magic states could occupy up to 95% of a quantum computer’s capacity, leaving little for the calculation itself. That is an estimate of the potential burden, not a measured capacity saving from the new Willow experiment.
In 2024, Google researchers Craig Gidney, Noah Shutty and Cody Jones refined an idea from earlier research into magic state cultivation. Their proposal treated preparation as a filtering process: start with an imperfect state, check it carefully, and retain attempts that pass. The intended payoff was a smaller quantum computer for practical tasks.
Getting that sequence to work exposed a problem in how the team measured success. Research scientist Emma Rosenfeld initially saw data that appeared to defy physics. After months of simulations, discussions and checks, she traced it to an incorrect assumption in the team’s usual measurement technique. Noise from electrical-equipment drift and temperature changes was undermining the benchmark’s validity.
The response involved both hardware control and a different way of checking the result. The researchers added controls to reduce the noise’s effects and developed a benchmarking technique that used cultivation to measure itself. Google says those changes, alongside other engineering and algorithmic work, enabled the reported demonstration.
Google reports 99.99% logical fidelity for its prepared T-states, a measure of how closely those states match the intended state.
The experiment also addressed how a cultivated state could move between two forms of quantum error correction. The team transferred states from a distance-3 color code to a distance-5 surface code. Google describes color codes as well suited to cultivation and surface codes as a more established approach. This “grafting” step tested whether purified states could survive the transfer inside its hardware.
Google says the work was published in Science on October 15, 2026. It calls the result a breakthrough, but says larger-scale demonstrations are still needed to make cultivation practical. The experiment establishes the technique on hardware; the resource-reduction goal still requires further scaling, with technical challenges remaining.
For readers looking to inspect the underlying material, an associated data record on Zenodo lists files for Figures 2, 3 and 4 and an example-usage notebook. The record names Google Quantum AI as the creator and is dated December 16, 2025, predating this week’s announcement.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain what would make an early result convincing to you.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.