Jim Cramer says Anthropic’s IPO could determine whether AI stocks recover
His argument links Anthropic’s ability to raise cash to its computing suppliers and corporate investors, as reported offering terms remain unsettled.
Loading page…
His argument links Anthropic’s ability to raise cash to its computing suppliers and corporate investors, as reported offering terms remain unsettled.
Listen to this story
Cramer is treating Anthropic’s still-pending IPO as a stress test for the financing behind AI infrastructure. CNBC reported that Google pays SpaceX about $900 million monthly for computing capacity, while Anthropic’s commitment exceeds $3 billion; those contracts support SpaceX’s purchases of Nvidia chips. Reuters-reported pricing details were later called inaccurate by Anthropic, and no final terms or completed offering are established. In Cramer’s view, a weak debut could prompt investors to reassess suppliers and investors tied to Anthropic, though the IPO’s timing and reception remain uncertain.
Anthropic’s monthly commitment to SpaceX reportedly grew from an initial $1.25 billion to more than $3 billion.
Emails reviewed by Reuters listed 867 million shares at $70 to $80, implying proceeds of about $60.7 billion to $69.3 billion; Anthropic said the pricing information was inaccurate.
CNBC reported Anthropic’s potential valuation had fallen from as much as $2 trillion earlier in the fall to as low as $1 trillion after a technology-stock sell-off.
A recovery in AI stocks may depend on investors backing one company’s stock-market debut, CNBC’s Jim Cramer argued on November 9. He cast Anthropic’s expected initial public offering as a test of the spending behind AI chips and data centers—not just a verdict on the company developing Claude.
The Mad Money host’s warning rests on a financial connection: suppliers can sell computing capacity and hardware, but a handful of AI developers ultimately need to earn enough to support that spending. Cramer argued that a disappointing Anthropic offering could undermine confidence in the companies supplying it, as well as in Anthropic itself.
Cramer pointed to SpaceX, which rents computing power to customers such as Google and Anthropic. Google pays about $900 million a month, CNBC reported. Anthropic’s monthly commitment has grown from an initial $1.25 billion to more than $3 billion, according to its IPO prospectus.
Those customer contracts support SpaceX’s purchases of Nvidia chips. In Cramer’s scenario, a failed Anthropic offering would leave it without the cash to fulfill its contracts. Investors would then have to lower their financial estimates for SpaceX, Nvidia, other computing providers and their suppliers.
There is also an ownership connection. Alphabet, Amazon and Nvidia hold stakes in Anthropic, exposing their earnings to changes in its valuation, CNBC reported.
The offering is approaching a less receptive market. CNBC reported that Anthropic’s potential valuation had fallen from as much as $2 trillion earlier in the fall to as low as $1 trillion after a technology-stock sell-off.
Later on November 9, Reuters reported that Anthropic had withdrawn pricing details sent to bankers, according to BeInCrypto’s account. Emails Reuters reviewed showed about 867 million shares at $70 to $80 each. Anthropic subsequently told bankers the pricing information was inaccurate and said an updated filing would follow.
At those withdrawn terms, the sale would have raised roughly $60.7 billion to $69.3 billion. BeInCrypto reported that the company’s pre-IPO perpetual futures contract on the derivatives exchange Hyperliquid fell nearly 7% after the reported withdrawal.
An SEC filing record shows Anthropic submitted an amended stock-offering registration statement, known as an S-1/A, on November 2.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Anthropic planned to meet major investors during the week of November 9 and was targeting a trading debut as early as November 19 or 20, according to CNBC. The Journal cited people familiar with the matter; the dates remain a reported target.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether the financial connections justify such a sweeping verdict.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.