Toolspublished

LlamaIndex and Kaggle Launch a Document Benchmark for Cost and Long Files

ExtractBench publishes a broader test for enterprise document extraction, while its launch results include company-reported figures for LlamaIndex’s own product.

By 2 min read
LlamaIndex and Kaggle Launch a Document Benchmark for Cost and Long Files
LlamaIndex and Kaggle Launch a Document Benchmark for Cost and Long Files

Listen to this story

The audio brief

About 1:41
0:001:41
Read transcript
LlamaIndex and Kaggle have launched ExtractBench, an open leaderboard that tests whether enterprise document-extraction systems can turn messy, long files into structured data—while measuring more than accuracy. The benchmark covers 14 systems, 370 documents, and 4,869 pages across eight business domains and 67 document types. It scores accuracy, table structure, perception quality, document length, domain coverage, and cost, using deterministic, rule-based checks rather than a language-model judge. That gives developers a defined way to compare workflows and submit their own systems. In the launch comparison, LlamaIndex reported that its Extract Agentic Plus system reached 95.6 percent accuracy at 8.1 cents per page. It reported Codex GPT-5.5 at 93.5 percent accuracy and 27.8 cents per page. Those headline product figures come from LlamaIndex’s own reporting, so they should not be treated as independent validation. The long-document results show why the broader test matters: LlamaIndex reported 94.4 percent accuracy for Extract Agentic Plus on long files, while Gemini 3.5 Flash scored 27.9 percent on that category, despite reaching 87.9 percent on short documents. LlamaIndex also says its system returned a source-document bounding box for every extracted value, helping reviewers trace fields back to the page—but that claim is vendor-reported too. The key thing to watch is whether outside developers add systems that make the leaderboard’s comparisons more independently testable.

Story brief

3 key points

LlamaIndex and Kaggle’s new ExtractBench gives enterprise document-extraction systems a public comparison that combines accuracy with cost, document length, table handling, domain coverage, and perception quality. The launch dataset covers 370 documents and 4,869 pages across 67 types, but several headline scores come from LlamaIndex’s own reporting, so they are not independent validation. For developers, the...

  1. 01

    ExtractBench evaluates 14 systems across eight business domains and 67 document types.

  2. 02

    LlamaIndex reported Extract Agentic Plus at 95.6% accuracy and $0.081 per page.

  3. 03

    Its reported long-document accuracy was 94.4%, while Gemini 3.5 Flash scored 27.9% on long files.

LlamaIndex and Kaggle have launched ExtractBench, an open leaderboard for systems that turn enterprise documents into structured data. The benchmark extends beyond a single accuracy measure, but its published product comparison includes results reported by LlamaIndex for its own extraction system.

A broader extraction test

ExtractBench evaluates 14 systems on 370 enterprise documents totaling 4,869 pages. The collection spans eight business domains and 67 document types, and includes frontier vision-language models, coding agents and specialized extraction APIs.

It scores accuracy, perception quality, table structure, document length, domain coverage and cost. Scoring is deterministic and rule-based rather than decided by a language-model judge, giving the benchmark a defined method for comparing systems across those measures.

The launch comparison

LlamaIndex reported that Extract Agentic Plus reached 95.6% overall accuracy at 8.1 cents per page. In the same comparison, it reported 93.5% accuracy and 27.8 cents per page for Codex GPT-5.5.

Where document length separates systems

Extract Agentic Plus reached 94.4% accuracy on long documents, according to LlamaIndex. Its published breakdown put Gemini 3.5 Flash at 87.9% on short documents and 27.9% on long documents, showing how a single overall figure can conceal length-sensitive results.

LlamaIndex says its agentic approach splits documents into sections and checks extracted values against source pages. The workflow is designed to handle and verify portions of a document rather than rely on a single pass over the full file.

Tracing fields back to the source

LlamaIndex says its Extract system was the only tested system to return a bounding box for every extracted value. The coordinates let reviewers locate fields in source documents, though the distinction remains a claim from the vendor.

The leaderboard is available on Kaggle, while the benchmark code and paper are available through GitHub and arXiv. LlamaIndex says developers can submit their own systems, creating a route for the public ranking to grow beyond its launch entries.

Sources

  1. llamaindex.aiLlamaIndex and Kaggle Launch a Document Extraction Leaderboard for AI Agents