Mantic Raises $25 Million After Beating Human Forecasters

The financing follows a standout contest result, while the startup’s claimed commercial deployments remain largely out of public view.

By 2 min read
Mantic Raises $25 Million After Beating Human Forecasters
Mantic Raises $25 Million After Beating Human Forecasters

Listen to this story

The audio brief

About 1:40
0:001:40
Read transcript
Mantic has raised twenty-five million dollars after its AI forecasting system beat every human competitor in the 2026 Metaculus Cup. The London startup finished second overall, behind only a bot called laertes, in a contest covering political, economic, and cultural outcomes. Radical Ventures led the seed round. Microsoft’s M12, Thinking Machines Lab, and Balderton Capital also participated, and Radical partner Aaron Rosenberg joined Mantic’s board. The valuation was not disclosed. The result is the company’s strongest public signal so far—but it is still only a signal. Mantic says it does not build a new frontier model from scratch. Instead, it adapts models developed by other labs, tests their forecasts against historical data, grades the results, and repeatedly improves the system. Its claimed advantage is avoiding consensus bias: following the crowd less closely when the crowd may be wrong. Chief executive Toby Shevlane cited two examples. Mantic reportedly gave Colombian presidential candidate Abelardo De La Espriella roughly a forty percent chance of winning early in the tournament, versus about thirty percent for the consensus forecast. It also avoided heavily backing the expected outcome in a Billboard Hot 100 question involving Shakira’s “Dai Dai” and “Waka Waka.” Shevlane says companies and government agencies have integrated Mantic’s AI, with hedge funds and trading firms showing particular interest. But the startup has named no customers and disclosed no commercial performance. The key constraint is whether a strong contest result can translate into verifiable results in real-world deployments.

Story brief

3 key points

Mantic raised a $25 million seed round led by Radical Ventures after its forecasting system finished first among human participants and second overall in the 2026 Metaculus Cup, behind the bot laertes. The London startup’s approach is orchestration rather than a proprietary frontier model: it adapts, tests, grades and iteratively improves models from other labs. The financing gives the company capital to...

  1. 01

    M12, Thinking Machines Lab and Balderton Capital joined the round; Radical partner Aaron Rosenberg joined Mantic’s board.

  2. 02

    The Metaculus Cup covered political, economic and cultural outcomes, with Mantic reportedly outperforming every human entrant.

  3. 03

    Mantic says its system avoids consensus bias; cited examples include Colombia’s election and a Billboard Hot 100 prediction.

Mantic’s AI system beat every human competitor in a recent forecasting tournament, yet the startup has not named the organizations using it. The London company has now raised $25 million in seed funding after finishing ahead of all but one bot in the 2026 Metaculus Cup.

Radical Ventures led the round at an undisclosed valuation. Microsoft’s venture fund M12, Thinking Machines Lab and Balderton Capital also participated, and Radical partner Aaron Rosenberg joined Mantic’s board.

The contest result behind the pitch

The summer Metaculus Cup asked participants to assign probabilities to political, economic and cultural developments. Mantic placed behind only a bot called laertes; Reuters described the event as the first competition in which AI entrants dominated the field.

Toby Shevlane, Mantic’s chief executive, co-founded the company with Ben Day in 2024. Shevlane previously worked as a research scientist at Google DeepMind, where he said a need to forecast AI-relevant global events helped inspire the company.

A system built on other labs’ models

Mantic does not present itself as the developer of a new frontier model. Instead, Shevlane said, it specializes frontier models from other labs for forecasting, evaluates them against historical data, grades their performance and iteratively improves the system.

Mantic’s stated improvement cycle

  • Adapt frontier models from other labs for forecasting.
  • Test forecasts against historical data and grade the results.
  • Use those evaluations to improve the system over time.

A claimed edge against consensus

Shevlane said part of Mantic’s advantage was avoiding herd mentality. He cited a question on whether Shakira’s “Dai Dai” would overtake “Waka Waka” on the Billboard Hot 100: human forecasters heavily backed the wrong outcome, while Mantic did not place a heavy bet on that consensus.

He also said Mantic gave Abelardo De La Espriella about a 40% chance of winning Colombia’s presidential election early in the tournament, against a roughly 30% consensus forecast. De La Espriella ultimately won. Those examples are Shevlane’s account of the system’s performance.

Interest is clearer than the customer list

Rosenberg said companies and government agencies around the world had integrated Mantic’s AI, though Mantic declined to identify customers. He said hedge funds and trading firms were particularly interested in its forecasts, making the company’s contest showing a useful signal—but not a public record of commercial results.

Sources

  1. channelnewsasia.comAI startup Mantic raises $25 million for superhuman forecasting
  2. marketscreener.comAI startup Mantic raises $25 million for superhuman forecasting

Loading discussion...

YOUR READING SPACE

Notifications

Mantic Raises $25 Million After Beating Human Forecasters | Superpower Daily