Musk backs Tesla–SpaceX merger as independent committees discuss a possible deal
Musk says a conflict of interest keeps him out of the discussions. Any deal would need shareholder approval, including support representing 50% of all Tesla shares.
Loading page…
Musk says a conflict of interest keeps him out of the discussions. Any deal would need shareholder approval, including support representing 50% of all Tesla shares.
Listen to this story
Musk argues that combining Tesla and SpaceX could align AI software and chip design with robotics, launch systems and connectivity, making the proposal relevant to both companies’ technology strategies. Independent-director committees are now evaluating a possible transaction, but have not agreed on terms, and Musk says he is excluded from their discussions as a conflicted party. Any deal would still require shareholder approval, including a demanding Tesla vote threshold.
Musk said the committees were formed at shareholders’ request and are responsible for evaluating the proposal.
For Tesla approval, Musk cited support from holders of 50% of all shares—not merely 50% of votes cast.
Musk cautioned that a merger is not certain, despite his endorsement of the idea.
Tesla and SpaceX have moved from merger speculation to discussions by special committees of independent directors, Elon Musk said during SpaceX’s third-quarter earnings call. He endorsed combining the companies, but said the committees had not agreed on terms. A transaction remains uncertain and would ultimately need shareholder approval.
The committees were formed at shareholders’ request, Musk said on Tuesday. Asked about the potential combination, he answered: “Do I think it would be a good idea? Yes.” That support came with a restriction on his own role: Musk said he could not participate in the committees’ discussions because he was a conflicted party.
Musk pointed to cooperation in AI software, chip design, robotics, launch capabilities and connectivity as areas where the companies could benefit. His argument linked software development with the hardware and infrastructure supporting it, rather than presenting the merger solely as a combination of vehicle manufacturing and space operations.
Those were Musk’s stated reasons for closer cooperation, not agreed terms for bringing the businesses together. He placed responsibility for evaluating a transaction with the two committees. As Firstpost quoted him: “I think it would be a good idea, but it's really up to the special committees of both companies.”
Some people out there assume that a SpaceX and Tesla merger is a certainty, and I think that would be overstating it
Elon Musk, during SpaceX’s third-quarter earnings call
Even if the committees reach an agreement, Musk said shareholders would have to support it. He singled out the Tesla requirement: approval representing 50% of all Tesla shares, not simply 50% of the shares cast in a vote. He described that as a high hurdle.
That distinction makes turnout consequential. A majority among participating shares would not necessarily deliver the support Musk said was required across the full share base. Shares not voted in favor would not help reach that threshold, even if supporters outnumbered opponents among those who cast ballots.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether the higher hurdle protects shareholders or gives nonvoters too much influence.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.