Musk spent at least $474 million on midterms as PAC-backed candidates lost, CNBC finds
Nearly half the money went to Texas, where the incoming governor supports tougher data-center rules. Republican control of the Legislature limits her reach.
Loading page…
Nearly half the money went to Texas, where the incoming governor supports tougher data-center rules. Republican control of the Legislature limits her reach.
Listen to this story
The most immediate business risk is in Texas: governor-elect Gina Hinojosa opposes corporate subsidies and has proposed a data-center moratorium, an end to industry tax breaks, and requiring operators to cover their full electricity costs. Those are campaign positions, not enacted rules; Republicans retain the legislature, and CNBC reports no confirmed project halt. At the federal level, Democrats may investigate Musk-linked contracts and ties, but Trump’s control of executive agencies and veto power constrain policy reversals.
CNBC attributed $224 million of Musk’s spending to Texas, where Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton and Governor Greg Abbott both lost.
America PAC spent nearly $87 million across 44 federal races; by Wednesday morning, its backed Republicans had lost 29, won three, and had 12 contests uncalled.
More than $80 million of PAC spending went to losing races, accounting for 93% of its spending—not 93% of the candidates it backed.
Elon Musk spent at least $474 million on the 2026 midterms, but most candidates backed by his America PAC lost, according to CNBC’s campaign-finance analysis published November 4. Nearly half his spending went to Texas, where Republican defeats put a critic of corporate subsidies and new data centers in the governor’s office.
CNBC calculated Musk’s spending from campaign-finance records, including $224 million directed into Texas. His favored candidates there—Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton and Governor Greg Abbott—both lost to Democrats. Those defeats removed two potential allies in a state that hosts major Musk businesses.
The nationwide America PAC tally covers a narrower slice of Musk’s political spending. CNBC’s analysis of Federal Election Commission filings found nearly $87 million spent across 44 federal races. By Wednesday morning, its Republican candidates had lost 29 contests and won three; another 12 remained uncalled.
More than $80 million of the PAC’s spending went toward races Republicans lost. The results were not final across all 44 contests, but the losses already accounted for 93% of its spending. That percentage measures money directed to losing races, not the share of candidates defeated.
The business connection runs through state decisions about electricity, water, environmental permits, infrastructure and tax incentives. Musk’s Texas operations depend heavily on those decisions. A change in the governor’s office can therefore affect the conditions under which projects proceed, even without a wholesale rewrite of state law.
Tesla operates its largest U.S. vehicle factory outside Austin, while SpaceX launches rockets from its Starbase complex in South Texas. Musk is also pursuing investments in AI and semiconductor manufacturing. The exposure extends beyond a single proposed data center to an established industrial presence and further expansion plans.
Governor-elect Gina Hinojosa campaigned against generous corporate subsidies and Musk himself. Her data-center proposals would change both whether new facilities can advance and who pays for their electricity needs. CNBC identified three positions:
These are policy positions, not new restrictions. Republicans still control the Texas Legislature, limiting Hinojosa’s power to overhaul state policy. CNBC said tougher permitting and business-incentive decisions could hinder Musk’s expansion plans, but there is no confirmed halt to his projects.
The defeats leave Musk with fewer allies in a Democratic-controlled Congress. CNBC said lawmakers could investigate his companies’ federal contracts, their Washington ties and his past leadership of President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency. That scrutiny could slow SpaceX’s government-contract business, but no congressional action has been announced.
Trump still controls executive agencies and holds veto power, limiting Democrats’ ability to reverse policies benefiting Musk’s defense-technology businesses. The election changes who can apply pressure in Congress, but it does not transfer every federal policy lever. That distinction matters when translating electoral losses into expectations for contracts or regulation.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether electoral defeats change your view of money’s political influence.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.