New York lawmakers urge Hochul to sign child chatbot safety bill passed in June
The sponsors want restrictions on harmful responses and designs that foster unhealthy emotional relationships.
Loading page…
The sponsors want restrictions on harmful responses and designs that foster unhealthy emotional relationships.
Listen to this story
New York’s child-chatbot measure, S9051B, is still awaiting Gov. Kathy Hochul’s signature months after clearing both legislative chambers in June. Sponsors Sen. Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Alex Bores renewed their call on Oct. 17, 2026, for her to sign it as passed. The proposal would place responsibility on chatbot providers to change engagement design as well as responses, with safeguards aimed at limiting minors’ exposure to harmful content and unhealthy emotional attachment.
The Senate and Assembly passed S9051B unanimously in June, but the article reports no signature or enactment yet.
The sponsors name OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and X as examples of providers the rules would affect.
They report backing from more than 20 statewide organizations, while at least three industry groups representing OpenAI or Anthropic opposed the bill.
New York lawmakers say their bill would protect children from dangerous chatbot features. But months after its June passage, they are still asking for the governor’s signature. In an October 17 opinion column, Senator Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Alex Bores urged Gov. Kathy Hochul to sign the measure as passed.
In an October 13 City & State opinion piece, Gonzalez said the bill, S9051B, had passed both the state Senate and Assembly unanimously.
As the sponsors describe it, the bill would require chatbot companies to prioritize child safety and change incentives that keep children hooked. Their stated goal reaches beyond filtering a single dangerous answer: it also addresses how a chatbot is designed to engage a young user and sustain that interaction.
Gonzalez’s earlier account identifies two connected targets: features that can create unhealthy emotional relationships with young users, and responses that promote harmful behavior or inappropriate content. The sponsors describe the proposed restrictions as follows:
Gonzalez and Bores name OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and X as examples of companies the legislation would affect. Their appeal places responsibility on the businesses providing the chatbots, asking them to restrict unsafe features rather than leaving children to navigate those features themselves.
The sponsors invoke Adam Raine’s death as part of their argument for action. They cite a lawsuit alleging that his use of ChatGPT led to his suicide. That causal claim is an allegation in litigation, not an established finding, and the lawmakers use it to argue that present-day risks deserve attention alongside debates about AI’s future.
We urge Gov. Hochul to sign it as passed.
Kristen Gonzalez and Alex Bores, New York Daily News opinion column, October 17, 2026
The sponsors say they developed the measure with families, experts and New York Attorney General Letitia James. They credit James with helping ensure the rules are legally sound and can be updated in the future.
They also report support from more than 20 organizations statewide. The coalition includes teacher unions, mental health practitioners, social workers and advocacy groups representing parents and children.
Gonzalez said at least three industry groups representing OpenAI or Anthropic opposed the chatbot bill.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain where protective design should end and ordinary conversation should begin.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.