Nvidia and Modulus Financial Say They Resolved AI Software Name Dispute
The companies asked a Texas court for time to finalize their agreement. Its terms remain undisclosed, and a trial had been scheduled for October.
Loading page…
The companies asked a Texas court for time to finalize their agreement. Its terms remain undisclosed, and a trial had been scheduled for October.
Listen to this story
Nvidia and Scottsdale-based Modulus Financial told the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas that they had resolved their trademark dispute over Nvidia’s former Modulus AI-development software, and asked for time to finalize an agreement. Nvidia had renamed the open-source tool PhysicsNeMo in 2025, but that did not end the pending case: an October trial remained on the calendar when the filing was made.
Modulus Financial sued Nvidia in 2024, alleging the shared software name could confuse consumers; Nvidia denied the allegation.
The filing does not disclose financial terms or whether the agreement requires anything beyond Nvidia’s reported name change.
The companies’ request for time to finalize the agreement does not itself alter the October trial schedule.
Nvidia and Modulus Financial Engineering told a federal court they have resolved a dispute over the former name of Nvidia’s AI software. They requested a pause to finalize their agreement. The case had been scheduled for trial in October, but the request alone does not change that schedule.
Modulus Financial sued Nvidia in 2024 over its use of “Modulus” for open-source software that helps developers build AI and machine-learning models. The financial software company alleged that the shared name could confuse consumers. Nvidia denied the allegation; the companies’ reported resolution is not a court finding that confusion occurred.
Modulus Financial pointed to its own place in the software market when making its case. According to its website, the Scottsdale, Arizona, company has supplied financial software to customers including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs since 1997. Its lawsuit also asserted that the company had gained recognition in AI. Those statements describe its position in the dispute, not a determination that Nvidia infringed its trademark.
Nvidia described the move to Nvidia PhysicsNeMo in a court filing earlier this year. Yet the lawsuit remained pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, with a trial scheduled for the following month when the companies notified the court of their resolution. A changed product name and an end to the litigation were thus separate steps.
The filing did not disclose the agreement’s financial or other terms. That leaves a material question unanswered: whether the settlement requires anything beyond the name change Nvidia had already reported. For now, the companies have asked for time to complete their agreement, rather than announced its specific commitments. Their request is not itself a court order pausing the case.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
What would make a name change enough—or not?
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.