Modelspublished

NVIDIA Says Vera Rubin Delivers 30x More Agentic Throughput per Megawatt, Pending Review

The preliminary comparison shifts attention from fixed prompt benchmarks toward the power required to keep long, tool-using AI sessions responsive.

By 3 min read
NVIDIA Says Vera Rubin Delivers 30x More Agentic Throughput per Megawatt, Pending Review

Listen to this story

The audio brief

About 1:32
0:001:32
Read transcript
NVIDIA says its Vera Rubin NVL72 system delivered up to 30 times the throughput per megawatt of the previous GB300 NVL72 system on a workload designed for long, tool-using AI sessions. The comparison ran at 160 output tokens per second per user, but it is preliminary: NVIDIA conducted the AgentX measurement, and SemiAnalysis had not independently reviewed it when the figure was published. The important shift is what gets measured. AgentX replays production-style coding sessions, rather than a single prompt followed by a single answer. It accounts for long-context processing, reuse of the KV cache, interactive decoding, pauses for tool calls, changing concurrency, and overall responsiveness. In other words, it asks how much useful agent activity a fixed power budget can sustain while the session still feels responsive. The result is highly dependent on the model and the software stack. NVIDIA says GB300 already delivered up to 15 times H200 efficiency on DeepSeek V4 Pro, and roughly 80 times on Kimi K3, at comparable interactivity. The Vera Rubin result uses a rack-scale configuration spanning 72 GPUs, with SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, Dynamo, optimized kernels, reduced-precision formats, and NVLink. So the 30-times figure is a claim about one workload, operating point, and configuration—not a standalone GPU measurement. The key constraint is whether SemiAnalysis’s review validates the preliminary result, especially alongside latency and time-to-first-token metrics.

Story brief

3 key points

NVIDIA is positioning Vera Rubin as a major efficiency upgrade for agentic serving, but its headline remains an unverified vendor measurement rather than an independent benchmark result. In AgentX, a rack-scale Vera Rubin NVL72 configuration reportedly sustained up to 30x GB300 NVL72 throughput per megawatt at 160 output tokens per second per user. The practical comparison depends on model, concurrency, context...

  1. 01

    AgentX measures long-context reuse, interactive decoding, tool-call gaps, dynamic concurrency and responsiveness—not just static token throughput.

  2. 02

    NVIDIA reports GB300 delivered up to 15x H200 efficiency on DeepSeek V4 Pro and roughly 80x on Kimi K3.

  3. 03

    The 30x figure covers a rack-level stack using SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, Dynamo, optimized kernels, reduced-precision formats and NVLink.

NVIDIA says Vera Rubin NVL72 delivered up to 30 times the throughput per megawatt of GB300 NVL72 for an agentic AI workload at 160 output tokens per second per user. The result is preliminary: NVIDIA ran the AgentX measurement, and SemiAnalysis had not yet reviewed it when NVIDIA published the figure.

The comparison is aimed at AI agents that work through multi-turn coding sessions rather than a fixed prompt and response. AgentX replays production-style sessions and measures long-context prefill, KV-cache reuse, interactive decoding, tool-call gaps, dynamic concurrency and throughput per provisioned megawatt.

The gap depends on the system and the model

NVIDIA’s existing GB300 NVL72 comparisons show how widely results can move with the model under test. It reports up to 15 times higher throughput per megawatt than H200 NVL8 on DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T, and roughly 80 times higher on Kimi K3 2.8T at comparable interactivity. NVIDIA also puts GB300’s cost per million tokens at up to 10 times lower than H200’s in the cited DeepSeek comparison.

A power metric with a responsiveness check

Throughput per megawatt alone does not establish whether an agent remains usable. AgentX pairs it with end-to-end normalized interactivity, generation-time interactivity, end-to-end latency and time to first token. Those measures capture both how much output a fixed power budget sustains and how quickly a session begins or finishes.

That workload focus distinguishes AgentX from a static sequence-length test. As sessions accumulate context and pause for tools or delegated work, a serving system must retain and reuse prior context while handling changing demand.

The benchmark result is a rack-level result

NVIDIA attributes GB300’s performance to its configured serving stack, including SGLang, TensorRT-LLM and vLLM; DeepGEMM-based kernels; MXFP4 and MXFP8 formats; Dynamo; and NVLink connectivity across 72 GPUs. NVIDIA says Dynamo can separately scale context processing and token generation, while its cache-aware routing weighs cache overlap and worker load.

That makes the 30x headline a claim about a particular workload, operating point and system configuration—not a standalone GPU measure. SemiAnalysis review remains the material test of NVIDIA’s preliminary Vera Rubin result.

Editorial analysis

Our Read

Our read: The important contest here is no longer only accelerator speed. AgentX is designed around context growth, cache reuse, tool pauses and variable concurrency, which makes serving software and rack-level coordination central to the outcome. NVIDIA’s 30x figure is a sharp early claim, but the reviewed result is the event that matters next. It will show whether that advantage survives the benchmark’s evaluation process at the stated workload and interactive target. The telemetry work previously added to AgentX also offers a useful lens for judging how a system reaches a favorable curve, not just where it lands.

Sources

  1. developer.nvidia.comNVIDIA Vera Rubin and Blackwell Set a New Standard for Agentic AI Performance per Watt | NVIDIA Technical Blog