OpenAI Says ChatGPT Sites Has Passed 5 Million Creations
The figure counts Sites created, not active users. OpenAI’s accompanying update draws a sharper line between shared editing and invitation-only access.
Loading page…
The figure counts Sites created, not active users. OpenAI’s accompanying update draws a sharper line between shared editing and invitation-only access.
Listen to this story
OpenAI’s three-month-old ChatGPT Sites has crossed 5 million creations, but the milestone is not an engagement metric: it excludes active users, usage frequency, and whether Sites remain online. The September 11 update adds team editing, private invitations, database inspection, and custom domains, extending the product from prompt-based app generation into collaborative deployment. OpenAI also claims deployment is twice as fast, without publishing a benchmark or methodology.
The 5 million total counts Sites created since launch, not active users or retained applications.
Editors can invite teammates to edit, save, and publish a Site.
Private sharing lets creators restrict access to specifically invited people without publishing publicly.
Three months after launching ChatGPT Sites, OpenAI says people have created more than 5 million of them. Its September 11 update pairs that company-reported milestone with new ways to edit a Site with teammates or share one privately with specific people.
OpenAI describes ChatGPT Sites as a way to build and host fully functional, interactive web applications. The 5 million figure is a count of Sites created since launch; it does not show how many people actively use the product, how often those Sites are used, or whether they remain online.
OpenAI reported the total on September 11. It measures Sites created since launch, rather than active users.
The two sharing options are distinct. OpenAI says teammates can be invited to edit, save and publish a shared Site. Separately, a creator can invite specific people to a private Site without making it public, preserving a narrower route for access.
The deployment-speed statement differs from the feature descriptions: it is a performance claim. OpenAI did not provide an independent benchmark or measurement methodology in its post, leaving no published basis for comparing the claimed reduction with another workflow or product.
The update places the product’s creation claim beside controls for who can participate and how a finished Site can be reached. Shared editing, private invitations, database inspection and custom domains all concern work around a Site after a user has started building it. The milestone signals early creation volume; the update supplies more ways to handle those creations with other people or under a custom web address.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain what evidence would make a speed claim useful.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.