OpenAI Says It Has Held Weeks of AI Safety Talks With Anthropic and DeepMind

The companies are discussing safety while a proposed legal safe harbor for sharing information faces an uncertain path through Congress.

By 2 min read
OpenAI Says It Has Held Weeks of AI Safety Talks With Anthropic and DeepMind
OpenAI Says It Has Held Weeks of AI Safety Talks With Anthropic and DeepMind

Listen to this story

The audio brief

About 1:22
0:001:22
Read transcript
OpenAI has been in safety talks with Anthropic and Google DeepMind for several weeks, meaning coordination among three leading AI developers is already happening behind the scenes. The discussions focus on risks that could affect both the companies and the public: systems becoming difficult to control, cyberattacks, biological threats, and attempts by Chinese companies to exfiltrate data. The disclosure comes as Congress considers whether companies need explicit antitrust protection to share that kind of information. OpenAI’s global policy chief, Chris Lehane, says existing law is sufficient and that the company does not need a waiver to coordinate on safety. Lawmakers pursuing a bipartisan proposal see it differently. Their narrow carveout would protect information-sharing about specific AI safety and security threats, including loss of control and data-exfiltration attempts. The measure has been folded into an annual defense bill, but broader AI legislation appears unlikely to pass before the end of 2026. The debate also follows a separate call from Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei to slow development of the most advanced systems, giving researchers more time to understand potential threats. So the immediate fact is that competitor safety discussions are no longer hypothetical. The unresolved question is whether those talks will produce shared practices—and whether Congress will create a dedicated legal safe harbor for them.

Story brief

3 key points

OpenAI has disclosed ongoing safety discussions with Anthropic and Google DeepMind, making competitor coordination an active practice rather than a hypothetical policy goal. The firms are discussing risks including loss of control, cyberattacks, biological threats, and data exfiltration, while lawmakers weigh a narrow antitrust safe harbor for sharing such information. OpenAI says no waiver is necessary, but a...

  1. 01

    The discussions have lasted several weeks and involve OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind.

  2. 02

    A proposed antitrust carveout would cover loss of control, cyber and biological threats, and Chinese data-exfiltration attempts.

  3. 03

    OpenAI policy chief Chris Lehane says existing law is sufficient for safety coordination; lawmakers disagree on whether protection is needed.

OpenAI says it has been working with Anthropic and Google DeepMind on AI safety for several weeks, bringing three leading developers into direct contact as concern grows over the risks of advanced systems. The newly disclosed talks are moving ahead while lawmakers consider whether companies need explicit legal protection to share certain safety information.

Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s global policy chief, said the company does not believe an antitrust waiver is necessary for the three firms to coordinate on safety matters. Anthropic and Google DeepMind did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

That position contrasts with a bipartisan proposal for a narrow antitrust carveout. The measure would let AI companies share information about loss of control over AI systems, cyber or biological threats, and attempts by Chinese companies to exfiltrate data.

The disclosure follows Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s call to slow development of the most advanced AI systems so researchers can better understand potential threats. OpenAI says it also supports bipartisan proposals for federal AI governance and measures addressing catastrophic AI risks.

The proposed antitrust legislation has been folded into an annual defense bill, according to a person familiar with the matter. But the outlook for broader action is weak: congressional action on AI legislation before the end of 2026 appears unlikely.

For now, OpenAI’s disclosure establishes that competitor discussions are already under way, not merely a policy proposal. Whether those talks produce shared practices—or whether Congress creates a dedicated legal safe harbor—remains unresolved.

Sources

  1. claimsjournal.comOpenAI Says It's Working With Anthropic, Google on AI Safety

Loading discussion...