OpenAI Will Reopen $200 Pro Sign-Ups September 30 With Revised Usage Terms
The monthly price stays the same, but OpenAI says the revised calculation changes what it buys. Subscribers can still use their weekly allocation without a five-hour limit.
Loading page…
The monthly price stays the same, but OpenAI says the revised calculation changes what it buys. Subscribers can still use their weekly allocation without a five-hour limit.
Listen to this story
OpenAI will reopen its $200 Pro subscription to new customers on September 30, 2026, with a revised usage formula: the weekly allocation is valued at half the prior plan’s API spend. Thibault Sottiaux says subscribers can use that allocation without the former five-hour limit, while OpenAI also plans non-usage-based features that have not yet been disclosed. The API-price comparison does not establish how many tasks users can complete, leaving prospective subscribers without enough detail to judge the plan’s value for their workloads.
Subscribers will be able to choose when to use their weekly allocation rather than operate under a five-hour clock.
OpenAI has not provided a dollar-denominated allowance or an estimate of how many tasks the revised plan will support.
The features planned for September 30 will not consume usage, but OpenAI has not named them.
OpenAI plans to reopen its $200 Pro subscription to new customers on September 30, 2026. But the familiar price will come with a different usage calculation. Thibault Sottiaux says the plan will represent less spending at API prices than before, while subscribers will retain control over when they use their weekly allocation.
In a September 29 post, Sottiaux said the revised $200 plan will net out at half the dollar value in API spending of the old $200 plan. The Decoder describes that as a halving of API credits per dollar. Neither description specifies a dollar-denominated allowance or tells a subscriber how many tasks the revised weekly allocation will cover. The comparison is about usage valued at API prices, not a claim that subscribers will finish half as much work.
Sottiaux argues that subscribers will still get more work done than they could on Pro a month ago, despite that change. It is his expectation, not a measured outcome for every kind of work. A comparison expressed in API spending cannot, on its own, predict how much a particular subscriber will accomplish.
The other side of the tradeoff is timing. Sottiaux says subscribers can use their weekly allocation when they choose, without a five-hour limit. That could be especially useful when work arrives in bursts. But freedom to concentrate usage on one day is different from getting more usage across the week. The lower API-spend equivalent and the removal of the five-hour limit describe different parts of the plan; neither settles how useful it will be for a subscriber’s particular workload.
Sottiaux also says OpenAI plans to add subscription features on September 30 that will not draw on usage. He has not identified them. Prospective customers therefore cannot yet weigh those additions against the revised calculation, even though they know the price, reopening date and stated approach to weekly use.
The change also reflects Sottiaux’s stated approach to pricing. He says OpenAI wants to lower API prices and improve models rather than keep API list prices high to make subscriptions look generous. His longer-term aim is to narrow the per-dollar gap between a subscription and API usage bought as needed. That is a direction he describes, not a new API rate or a dated commitment.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Which part of that tradeoff matters more to you?
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.