Spotify targets early 2027 for paid AI remixes and covers, FT reports
Subscribers could pay an extra $4–$5 a month, but pricing and timing remain provisional. Label agreements would not automatically make every artist’s music available.
Loading page…
Subscribers could pay an extra $4–$5 a month, but pricing and timing remain provisional. Label agreements would not automatically make every artist’s music available.
Listen to this story
Spotify is developing a Premium add-on for AI versions of existing songs, with a first-quarter 2027 target that remains tentative; a February Grammy-week announcement is only being considered. The business model and available catalog are still unresolved: the reported $4–$5 monthly fee could change, Sony Music and Warner Music are still negotiating, and artists retain an individual opt-in even under label deals. Spotify says participating rights holders would receive royalties, and each remix would link back to its original track.
The tool could change a song’s style or make it sound as though another artist performed it, but Spotify’s stated scope excludes entirely new works.
Universal Music Group and Merlin have signed on, while Sony Music and Warner Music are still negotiating catalog licenses.
Believe and TuneCore describe a two-step consent process: artists opt in to AI programs, then separately choose whether to join Spotify’s remix service.
Spotify’s AI remix tool has a reported launch window, but not a settled price or complete licensing lineup. The Financial Times reported on October 30, 2026, that Spotify is targeting early 2027 for a paid service letting subscribers reshape existing songs. The service has not launched, and artists would retain a say even where their labels sign.
The FT reporting, summarized by InvestorsHub, cites people familiar with the plans and puts the target in the first quarter of 2027. A possible announcement around February’s Grammy Awards is also under consideration. Both the launch schedule and proposed additional charge of $4 to $5 a month could change.
The proposed features would let listeners change a recording’s musical style—for example, turning a folk song into a dance track. Another reported option would produce a version that sounds as though a different artist performed it.
Spotify has already described the tool’s basic boundary. In its October 20 announcement with music company Believe, Spotify said it is designed for AI-powered remixes and covers of existing songs, not entirely new works. The company also described it as a paid add-on for Premium subscribers, without specifying a price.
Universal Music Group and independent-label group Merlin have signed on, according to the FT account. Sony Music and Warner Music are still negotiating over catalog licensing. Believe’s earlier agreement covers participating artists and labels at Believe and TuneCore.
Believe and TuneCore have described a two-step consent process:
Spotify says streams of the remixes will generate royalties for participating artists and the rights holders behind the original works. Every remix will also link back to its original track and artist. Spotify and Believe frame the project as a licensed home for fan remixing that already happens widely, often without paying artists and songwriters.
Spotify shares were up 6% in afternoon trading on October 30 following the report, according to 24/7 Wall St.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether permission changes your view of an AI-reworked performance.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.