Together AI Adds Three Model Rollout Paths; Canary Pauses on Metric Regressions
The newly detailed endpoint controls offer faster and capacity-preserving migration options, but only canary releases stop to assess live performance between traffic shifts.
Listen to this story
The audio brief
Story brief
3 key pointsTogether AI now lets teams shift traffic between model deployments behind one inference endpoint using canary, blue-green, or rolling strategies. Canary is the only option that can stop between traffic stages based on live router error rate, latency, or in-flight requests. In the documented Qwen2.5-7B-to-Qwen3.5-9B test, the system detected a 137% p95 latency increase at 10% traffic and reversed the rollout....
- 01
Canary stages used 10%, 50%, and 100% traffic, with 600-second intervals and a 300-second p95 latency window.
- 02
Blue-green performs one cutover; rolling replaces replicas individually, and neither provides canary-style metric gates between steps.
- 03
A failed gate, capacity shortfall, or missing metrics moves the rollout to SYSTEM_PAUSED for operator resume or cancellation.
Together AI has introduced rollout controls that move traffic between model deployments on the same inference endpoint. The new feature gives teams three ways to make a production change, but only its canary path can halt between traffic steps when live metrics show a regression.
The safety check belongs to one path
A rollout transfers requests from a source deployment to a target deployment. Together says applications can keep calling a stable endpoint while multiple deployments operate behind it, separating an infrastructure change from an application update.
The distinction is consequential. Canary releases shift traffic through operator-defined stages and can check router error rate, router latency, or in-flight requests after each stage. Blue-green and rolling releases still run health checks, but they do not have canary-style metric gates between traffic steps.
The measured route found a problem early
Together’s documented Qwen2.5-7B-to-Qwen3.5-9B canary found a 137% p95 latency regression when the target was handling 10% of traffic. The company says it canceled and reversed the rollout while live requests continued without failures. It is a company example, not evidence of typical rollout results.
The documented canary setup
- Traffic moved through 10%, 50%, and 100% stages, with 600-second intervals.
- The p95 latency measurement window was 300 seconds.
Pausing still leaves a decision to make
A failed metric gate, insufficient capacity, or missing metrics can place a rollout in SYSTEM_PAUSED. Operators can resume or cancel it. Canceling freezes the traffic split rather than automatically restoring the old deployment; returning traffic requires a new rollout with source and target swapped.
Sources
- together.aiThe production platform for open-weight AI inference
- together.aiCanary rollouts: upgrade models in production without downtime
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.