Trump Is Expected to Name Jay Clayton AI Czar, Bloomberg Says
The intelligence chief would inherit David Sacks’s former role as Trump backs industry self-policing. Whether Clayton would keep both jobs is unclear.
Listen to this story
The audio brief
Story brief
3 key pointsAn anonymous source told Bloomberg that Trump could announce Clayton’s appointment as soon as Oct. 2, but no formal decision had been made. Clayton would take over the AI adviser role vacated when David Sacks’s special-government-employee term expired; it remains unclear whether he would also keep directing national intelligence. The choice would put AI policy in the hands of an official with an existing national-security remit, as Trump rejects new AI-specific rules and favors company self-policing.
- 01
Sacks has stayed in contact with Trump and argued that AI development should remain largely free of regulation.
- 02
Days before the report, Trump hosted nearly two dozen Silicon Valley executives and released a one-page pledge focused on company responsibility.
- 03
Dario Amodei called for pacing AI development and greater government regulation in a Sept. 12 essay; Sacks argued new rules could disadvantage smaller companies.
President Donald Trump is expected to choose his intelligence chief, Jay Clayton, as the next White House AI czar, Bloomberg reported on October 2. The prospective appointment would put the official overseeing the nation’s intelligence agencies into a role focused on advancing AI development. No formal appointment had been announced when Bloomberg’s article was published.
Bloomberg reporters Jeff Mason and Michael Shepard cited a person familiar with the matter who spoke anonymously before a formal announcement. That person said Trump might reveal the appointment as soon as October 2. The New York Times and other news organizations had previously identified Clayton as Trump’s top choice.
One candidate, potentially two jobs
Clayton has served as director of national intelligence since July, following Senate confirmation. He now oversees the country’s sprawling intelligence bureaucracy. Before taking that position, he served as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, handling high-profile cases for the administration. Bloomberg also described him as a golf companion of Trump.
Whether Clayton would retain his intelligence position while taking on the AI assignment remains unclear. Holding two senior roles would not be without precedent in this administration: Secretary of State Marco Rubio is among the officials juggling more than one key job. But Clayton’s own arrangement has not been settled publicly.
The position Clayton would inherit was previously held by venture capitalist David Sacks, Trump’s first AI czar. Sacks has remained in contact with the president since leaving government and has continued to argue that AI development should stay largely free of regulation so that innovation can flourish.
A development brief under a self-policing policy
Trump announced his intention to appoint a new AI adviser last month as public concern about the technology’s risks grew. The expected selection comes days after he hosted nearly two dozen Silicon Valley executives at the White House, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, to discuss safety concerns.
After that meeting, Trump rejected new AI rules and reiterated that the industry should police itself. He also released a one-page pledge signed by leading attendees, including Huang, Amodei, OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai. His position favors company responsibility rather than additional AI-specific restrictions.
The president has framed continued AI development as both an economic opportunity and a national security priority. He has promoted data-center construction as a source of jobs and domestic investment, while citing competition with China in resisting calls for more oversight. Trump and his allies argue that existing liability laws provide sufficient protection.
That approach faces objections from within the industry. Amodei called for pacing AI development and greater government regulation in a September 12 essay. Sacks criticized that position, arguing that additional rules would make it harder for smaller companies to challenge larger players. The dispute concerns who sets safety requirements, not simply who occupies the White House advisory job.
Sources
- syndication.washingtonpost.comTrump set to name Jay Clayton as AI czar with safety fear rising
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.