Trump Says AI Leaders Signed a Voluntary Accord for Internal and External Reviews
The president backed self-policing over new development limits and separately described commitments to help communities hosting data centers.
Loading page…
The president backed self-policing over new development limits and separately described commitments to help communities hosting data centers.
Listen to this story
The practical terms of the accord remain unclear: Trump described voluntary self-policing, but the report identifies no review standards, external reviewers, or confirmed individual signers. On September 29, 2026, he rejected new federal limits while pointing to existing Department of Justice and FBI authority. He also said AI firms would support schools or reduce energy costs amid local resistance to data centers, without specifying amounts or commitments.
Executives at the meeting had differing public positions: Anthropic’s Dario Amodei had urged leading firms to slow development, while Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg emphasized company responsibility.
Attendees included OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and Elon Musk; attendance does not confirm anyone signed.
Companies represented at the meeting are spending hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure, and Trump warned that opposition could push projects elsewhere or overseas.
President Donald Trump said on September 29, 2026, that he and AI company leaders signed a voluntary accord at the White House. He said it would include internal and external reviews of AI—a self-regulation approach announced while the president continued to reject new restrictions on AI development.
Trump presented the agreement after an extensive meeting with technology executives. The Gulf Coast News report did not provide review standards or identify who would conduct the external reviews.
I think I’m seeing tremendous self-policing. And they understand that they have to self-police.
President Donald Trump, speaking to reporters outside the West Wing
Earlier that day, Trump promised the government would not limit AI development or support calls for guardrails or other restrictions. “I will never stifle the growth of a technology that will be bigger than the industrial revolution,” he said.
After the lunch, he also pointed to existing federal authority. Trump said there was widespread agreement on self-regulation, adding, “and we automatically have regulation with the Department of Justice, the FBI, all of that.”
The meeting brought together executives with different public views about safety and speed. Anthropic’s Dario Amodei had called earlier in September for leading firms to slow development. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg had downplayed concerns about runaway AI and emphasized each company’s responsibility for product safety.
Attendees included Amodei, OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Huang and Elon Musk. Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Zuckerberg and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella also attended. Vice President JD Vance, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and House Speaker Mike Johnson joined the gathering.
The report did not identify individual signatories, so attendance alone does not confirm that any named executive signed.
Technology firms represented at the meeting are spending hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure, including data centers. Those projects have prompted grassroots opposition across party lines.
Trump also said executives agreed to address local resistance by providing more financial support to local schools or taking steps to reduce energy costs.
“You’re going to see, data centers are going to be very popular,” Trump predicted. He warned that continued opposition could force projects overseas or to other locations.
Story updates
AI founders and venture capitalists at San Francisco Tech Week welcomed the Trump administration’s hands-off approach to AI safety this week, according to the Associated Press. Their enthusiasm follows a voluntary White House pact that asks advanced AI labs to monitor themselves, without detailed safety requirements or an explained federal process for checking implementation.
Trump hosted technology executives at the White House on September 29 for a luncheon and ceremonial signing. Representatives of OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, SpaceXAI and Nvidia signed the accord. The agreement puts those companies’ own safety arrangements at the center of the administration’s approach.
The 308-word document calls on advanced AI labs to follow safety protocols and establish internal teams to monitor their progress. It does not spell out detailed safety measures. Asked how the government would monitor implementation, the White House reiterated Trump’s position on balancing innovation and security without directly explaining a checking process.
Several signatories described their safety arrangements to AP. Their responses ranged from plans to bring in outside reviewers to changes in internal standards and board governance. Those are different ways of organizing scrutiny, rather than a single detailed testing requirement set out in the pact.
OpenAI said it is committed to embedding external assessors and finalizing contracts with third-party safety assessors. The company described these as commitments, not completed arrangements.
Anthropic said it is bringing in independent evaluators and discussing collaborations with industry groups. Its response described outside scrutiny alongside possible industry cooperation.
Meta pointed to updated standards for training, evaluating and releasing its most capable models, along with efforts to refine its board’s governance structure.
At a crowded Tech Week event on Wednesday, founders and investors said the government’s hands-off stance would mean higher profits for companies building AI-powered defense and security systems. Panelists praised the administration’s industry support at an investment-focused meeting organized as part of Andreessen Horowitz’s series of events.
Kyle Stanford, a venture capital research director at PitchBook, framed defense spending as an investment opportunity. He told attendees that the U.S. government was allocating $1 trillion to defense, including $13.5 billion for autonomous systems and AI, and said that spending had attracted unprecedented capital to defense technology.
This is no substitute for hard law, and it does give a lot of freedom to the companies.
Robinson, who recently resigned from OpenAI, questioned letting advanced labs police themselves. He said the time between model generations is measured in weeks and warned of serious near-term safety challenges. His concern contrasts with the profit-focused response among founders and investors at the Tech Week gathering.
Voluntary commitments are not new. Under President Joe Biden, leading AI companies made safety pledges that included specific guidelines for tests and transparency reports. Sarah Myers West, a former senior AI adviser to the Federal Trade Commission and now co-executive director of AI Now, told AP that the current accord lacks those specifics.
The administration has also canceled earlier requirements for AI developers to share safety-test results with the federal government. In December, Trump signed an executive order aimed at blocking state-level AI regulations, arguing that a patchwork of rules could stifle the industry. Both steps form the policy backdrop to the Tech Week enthusiasm.
Graham Steele, a former assistant secretary at the Treasury Department, raised a separate concern about who controls evaluations. He warned that internal teams or hired outside evaluators can face undue pressure. He also questioned whether companies should hold decision-making power over matters with broad social and political consequences.
apnews.comGreat to meet today with @POTUS, @JDVance, @SpeakerJohnson and Administration + tech leaders. Important conversation and we signed today the White House Accord on Super Intelligence. As I shared today, Google has invested hundreds of billions in the last two years alone, with more to come, across the entire stack, to deliver benefits for America and the world. We’re working to build products that deliver real value for people and businesses, invest in local communities, and build trust in the technology. Industry also has to innovate responsibly. Google’s focused on building the right way, with appropriate testing, evaluations, red-teaming, and other safeguards against misuse and...
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain what would make that trust justified—or misplaced.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.