U.S. stocks retreat as investors question returns on AI spending
Selling has reached bonds backing some data centers, raising the stakes for an economy that has leaned heavily on technology investment.
Loading page…
Selling has reached bonds backing some data centers, raising the stakes for an economy that has leaned heavily on technology investment.
Listen to this story
By Oct. 15, the S&P 500 had slipped more than 1% from its record and the Nasdaq about 4%, as investors questioned whether AI-related revenue can support the scale of investment and borrowing behind data centers. The concerns span slower revenue growth at Anthropic, debt financing and chip competition, while inflation and interest-rate worries add pressure. The pullback puts the economic role of technology investment under closer scrutiny, though the report also notes that some executives still view AI infrastructure spending as a source of resilience.
NBC News reported Anthropic revenue of nearly $17 billion and said the company described itself as profitable; the reported concern was slower growth, not falling revenue.
Investors have started selling some data-center-backed bonds amid doubts that AI revenues will cover the borrowing used to build facilities.
Ed Yardeni cut his year-end S&P 500 target to 7,900 from 8,400, still above the roughly 7,600 index level cited Thursday morning.
A week after record highs, U.S. stocks were retreating as investors questioned whether AI revenues would justify the spending. By the morning of October 15, the S&P 500 was more than 1% below its record and the Nasdaq about 4% below its peak—a pullback with potential consequences beyond technology portfolios.
One catalyst was a Financial Times report on Wednesday that Anthropic’s quarterly revenue growth had slowed, according to NBC News. The concern was about the pace of expansion, not a reported fall in revenue. NBC put Anthropic’s revenue at nearly $17 billion and said the company described itself as profitable.
At the same time, investors had begun selling bonds backing some data centers. Their concern, NBC reported, was that AI revenues might not cover the large sums borrowed to build those facilities. That puts the financing behind the expansion under scrutiny, alongside the share prices of companies expected to benefit from it.
Memory-chip competition added another source of unease. Investors were concerned that Chinese manufacturers could undermine Western rivals or produce enough memory to create an oversupply. Those fears sat alongside a global shortage of processing chips driven by the data-center buildout. The concerns involved different chip markets, rather than a single verdict on demand for all AI hardware.
On Thursday, economist Ed Yardeni cut his year-end S&P 500 target to 7,900 from 8,400. He cited greater investor caution about the AI trade, together with lingering concerns about inflation and higher interest rates. His revision reflected a combination of technology-investment doubts and broader economic pressures, rather than AI concerns alone.
The revised target still stood above the index’s level of about 7,600 in Thursday morning’s account. Yardeni was reducing his expectation for where stocks would finish the year, not forecasting a year-end level below that snapshot. The Nasdaq’s larger retreat from its peak also put technology shares at the center of the current pullback.
The economic stakes extend beyond investors’ portfolios. NBC reported that tech-related spending accounted for nearly half of U.S. economic growth this year. That figure covers technology spending, not AI alone. It nevertheless shows how much the expansion has depended on investment in a sector now facing closer questions about its returns.
Technology-led stock gains have also supported a wealth effect: rising portfolio values have helped sustain consumer spending and, in turn, the job market. NBC described that support as part of an uneven economy, with lower- and middle-income households still struggling with persistent inflation and declining earnings despite sturdy overall growth.
There is still a case for resilience. Earlier this week, Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf said AI infrastructure investment, high employment and consistent wage growth continued to outweigh risks from higher interest rates, oil prices and inflation. In his assessment, the buildout remained an economic support rather than a liability.
Thursday brought another pressure point: business inflation reached its highest rate since December 2022, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures cited by NBC. Citi analysts warned that higher rates, elevated energy prices, slow job growth and an equity sell-off—if it continues—pose downside risks to consumer spending.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether financing risks or continued investment deserve more weight.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.