US Data Centers Could Use 1.125 Trillion Liters of Water by 2030, Straining Dry Regions
The key question is not a universal water cost per AI query. It is whether new computing capacity is added where heat, drought and fossil-powered electricity make each unit of demand more consequential.
Listen to this story
The audio brief
Story brief
3 key pointsThe main planning risk is regional, not national: data centers may have modest aggregate water use but intensify shortages where facilities cluster. A 2030 estimate of up to 1.125 trillion liters includes water consumed in electricity generation, unlike the 66 billion-liter 2023 cooling estimate. Texas could see data centers rise from under 1% of water demand today to 3–9% by 2040. Renewable-powered sites,...
- 01
The 2030 forecast combines facility cooling with water used by coal- and gas-fired power plants.
- 02
Texas researchers project data centers could account for 3–9% of state water demand by 2040.
- 03
Fengqi You estimates siting and related measures could reduce future AI water use by up to 86%.
A rapid data-center buildout could put new pressure on already dry parts of the United States even though cooling accounted for less than 1 percent of national water consumption in 2023. By 2030, US data centers could consume as much as 1.125 trillion liters annually under a forecast from Fengqi You’s research group.
One footprint, two very different scales
Researchers estimated that US data-center cooling systems consumed 66 billion liters in 2023. The national total can mask the practical conflict: growing capacity may add significant water stress in drought-strapped places such as Arizona and New Mexico, while creating less concern in water-rich regions.
The 2023 figure and the 2030 forecast are not like-for-like measures. The earlier estimate covers cooling; the forecast also includes water used to generate electricity. Coal- and gas-fired plants require water to cool steam after it turns turbines, extending a facility’s water footprint beyond its own cooling equipment.
The choices behind the forecast
Per-query water claims are a poor guide to that system-level result. Shaolei Ren says his 2024 estimate that a short GPT-4 email used 500 milliliters of water is already outdated as models have become more efficient. Google estimated that a median-length Gemini query used about five drops in 2025, but that is a company estimate for one chatbot, not a universal AI measure.
- Power: Moving toward solar and wind can reduce water use because they require little to no water to operate, unlike fossil-fuel generation.
- Siting: Locating facilities away from drought-prone areas and near renewable supply could significantly reduce the footprint. You estimates siting and related measures could cut future AI water use by up to 86 percent.
- Cooling: Liquid systems can recirculate cooled fluid in a closed loop, but extreme heat or humidity can still require extra water-based cooling.
Efficiency does not settle the local question
Texas shows the range of possible outcomes. Data centers now consume less than 1 percent of the state’s water demand, but researchers estimated a 3 to 9 percent share by 2040. Engineers expect efficiency gains to reduce that eventual figure, leaving local climate, electricity infrastructure and facility design as the decisions that will determine the burden.
Sources
- knowablemagazine.orgHow much of a problem is AI’s water use?