Wildlife groups and bikers press Google to abandon its Thurrock data center
Campaigners challenge Google’s biodiversity and emissions assurances as Thurrock Council prepares to decide the initial application in early 2027.
Loading page…
Campaigners challenge Google’s biodiversity and emissions assurances as Thurrock Council prepares to decide the initial application in early 2027.
Listen to this story
Opposition to Google’s proposed Thurrock data-center campus has united wildlife groups, environmental advocates and the Thurrock Hammers motorcycle club, which wants racing restored at the former Arena Essex site. A petition with nearly 55,000 signatures was delivered to Google last Wednesday; campaigners cite threatened species and Foxglove’s estimate of up to 570,000 tonnes of annual emissions, while Google says habitat measures and renewable-energy financing can mitigate harm. Thurrock Council expects an initial ruling in early 2027, followed by scrutiny of a detailed plan, so the project is not yet finally approved.
Of about 1,000 planning submissions, only one supported the project; Thurrock Council cautioned that many responses came from outside the local area.
Buglife and local groups say the site supports an endangered plant, a rare bumblebee and other invertebrate habitat.
Google says it will fund new renewable energy and aims to become carbon-neutral by 2030.
Google says its proposed data center in Thurrock, east of London, can protect biodiversity and offset emissions. Wildlife campaigners, environmental groups and motorcycle enthusiasts want it stopped instead. Last Wednesday, campaigners took a petition with almost 55,000 signatures to Google’s UK headquarters, calling for the company to abandon the project, WIRED reports.
Buglife campaigner Jamie Robins brought a letter detailing the petition to the company’s Kings Cross offices. Members of the coalition gathered outside with placards urging Google to “search elsewhere.” Their shared target is one development, but their reasons for opposing it differ: protecting rare species, limiting pollution and returning motorcycle racing to a disused track.
The proposed campus would occupy a site containing the remains of Arena Essex, a former motorcycle racing stadium, alongside grassland and a lake. Google bought the property through a subsidiary in 2023 and applied for permission to build the campus in May 2025. The application brought local opponents together with national wildlife and environmental organizations.
The petition is not the only channel opponents have used. Of about 1,000 public responses submitted to the planning authority, only one supported the project. Thurrock Council cautioned that many submissions came from people outside the local area, so the response count should not be read as a tally of nearby residents alone.
We recognize the ecological value of these sites. Our goal is to minimize the impact as much as possible.
Adam Elman, Google’s director of sustainability for EMEA, speaking to WIRED
Google disputes the objections, saying they rest on misconceptions about its plans. Its proposed biodiversity measures include retaining habitat and moving endangered plants elsewhere. The company says those steps would deliver a net gain in biodiversity. On emissions, it says it will finance new renewable energy generation as offsets, with a goal of becoming carbon-neutral by 2030.
The company also rejects the club’s characterization of the stadium’s loss. Google argues that the track has been unused for years, so demolishing it would not remove an invaluable community facility. The riders’ wish to resume racing puts the dispute over the site’s future use alongside the arguments about its current ecological value.
Thurrock Council told WIRED it expects to rule on the initial planning application in early 2027. That decision would not complete the review: Google would then need a more detailed development plan, subject to further scrutiny. Campaigners say they intend to contest the project at each stage, leaving both the initial decision and any later detailed plan as points of continued resistance.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain when relocation would—or would not—be an acceptable compromise.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.