WIRED uncovers 400-plus apps and domains hiding abusive AI deepfake tools
The network used server-controlled interfaces to conceal explicit features. Apple removed apps and Meta blocked advertisers, but similar services kept appearing.
Loading page…
The network used server-controlled interfaces to conceal explicit features. Apple removed apps and Meta blocked advertisers, but similar services kept appearing.
Listen to this story
WIRED traced a network of more than 400 apps and domains that presented as benign services but could load hidden tools for generating sexually abusive deepfakes. Shared code tied almost 500 domains together, while researchers linked the operation technically to Chinese-language developers and Hong Kong-registered KeLing Technology; the company did not publicly acknowledge ownership. Apple removed 19 apps after the investigation, Google had already removed most identified apps, and Meta said it acted against 11,600 ad accounts and blocked 209 apps. Similar ads and apps were still appearing as WIRED wrapped up its investigation.
In September, 27 identified apps were live on Google Play and had more than 350,000 downloads combined; many carried all-ages ratings.
Apps could route users to different interfaces based on origin, language and a unique identifier, though researchers had not identified all the triggers.
Hundreds of the associated Facebook and Instagram ads contained AI-generated child sexual abuse material, including images using real children’s photographs.
More than 400 connected apps and web domains disguised sexually abusive AI deepfake tools as ordinary services, a WIRED investigation published November 2 found. Apps advertised as pet portrait makers, language tutors and workout coaches could instead load hidden interfaces that turned uploaded photographs into explicit images and videos, including depictions of sexual violence.
Researchers uncovered the network by following links from thousands of explicit video advertisements on Facebook and Instagram. Those ads directed people to deceptive apps in Apple’s and Google’s stores. WIRED reported that hundreds of the ads contained AI-generated child sexual abuse material, including images using photographs of real children.
The disguise was more than a misleading store description. Paul Bouchaud, a lead researcher at nonprofit AI Forensics, reverse engineered the apps and associated websites. He found that an app contacted a server with information such as the user’s origin, language and a unique identifier. The server then decided whether to display the benign service or the explicit interface.
Researchers had not identified a complete set of triggers. One apparent trigger was downloading an app after clicking an associated Meta advertisement. Visiting an app’s website directly could produce only a black screen, even though that website hosted the explicit interface loaded inside the app.
That hidden interface offered dozens of sexual image and video templates. Users could upload someone’s photograph and buy digital credits called diamonds to generate the material. It also linked to social media accounts where users could contact the developers with questions or complaints.
The websites’ code also exposed the network’s structure. Researchers found a JavaScript bundle containing a configuration list of related domains and apps, alongside app package details, encryption keys and Facebook advertising trackers. Maël Le Touz, a staff threat researcher at security firm Infoblox, identified almost 500 linked domains through his investigation.
They run the same code and they all reference one another.
Maël Le Touz, Infoblox staff threat researcher, speaking to WIRED
Bouchaud’s research traced the network’s emergence to late 2025, followed by a surge in spring 2026. At one point, roughly 30 app-and-website combinations were being registered each week. In September, 27 apps were live on Google Play; collectively, those apps had more than 350,000 downloads, and many carried ratings suitable for all ages.
WIRED linked the operation to Chinese-language developers and Hong Kong-registered KeLing Technology Limited, citing domain records, contact addresses and an administration login page mentioning Keling. Le Touz also pointed to Chinese hosting and Chinese-language code comments. These were technical and registration links, not a public acknowledgment of ownership by the company.
KeLing-linked email addresses and other contacts did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment. After those inquiries, KeLing addresses disappeared from associated websites and some related social media channels were renamed, WIRED observed.
Meta said it had already banned KeLing from advertising in 2025 after the company failed to comply with a cease-and-desist letter. It said the company continued trying to advertise through other routes, using deceptive identities and destinations. As WIRED completed its investigation, similar ads and apps were still being published.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain how much responsibility stores should retain once an app passes review.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.