Boston Symphony will premiere a symphony that brings AI into live performance
Tod Machover’s “already and not yet” uses AI to connect musicians, not just generate sound. Its three movements explore democratic breakdown and renewal.
Loading page…
Tod Machover’s “already and not yet” uses AI to connect musicians, not just generate sound. Its three movements explore democratic breakdown and renewal.
Listen to this story
The Boston Symphony Orchestra’s commissioned work embeds a MIT Media Lab-built AI system in a live orchestral performance, with the system’s role shifting from highlighting individual musicians to connecting them. The setup depends on studio-made electronic layers and live sound mixing, and composer Tod Machover cautions that current AI can identify audio patterns better than it can interpret expressive intent. The performances offer a concrete test of how AI can shape musical exchange onstage without replacing human control of the sound.
The premiere is October 22, 2026, at Symphony Hall, followed by performances on October 23 and 24; the BSO lists no online watch link.
The work’s second movement spotlights players individually, while the third asks the AI system to connect their performances.
MIT Media Lab PhD candidates Manaswi Mishra built the AI systems, and Ana Schon will mix the sound live.
On October 22, 2026, at 7:30 p.m. Boston local time, the Boston Symphony Orchestra will premiere Tod Machover’s “already and not yet” at Symphony Hall. The promise is AI that interacts with live musicians. Kent Nagano conducts; the BSO’s official event page offers in-person tickets but lists no online watch link.
After opening night, the program returns on October 23 at 1:30 p.m. and October 24 at 8 p.m., with times listed locally for Boston. Machover’s work shares the program with Mendelssohn’s The Hebrides Overture and Symphony No. 5, “Reformation,” plus the U.S. premiere of Alex Nante’s Ein feste Burg.
Saturday ticket holders can also attend a 6:30 p.m. conversation between Machover and composer George Lewis in the Cabot-Cahners Room. Their subject is the history and possible future of musical AI. The BSO commissioned the symphony with support from the Massachusetts Cultural Council’s New Works Fund.
The BSO describes a live AI system that collaborates with each musician and creates connections across the orchestra. Developed at the MIT Media Lab, it works alongside electronic layers crafted in Machover’s studio. Its intended role changes as the composition moves from individual expression toward a more connected ensemble.
In the second movement, the system aims to bring out each instrumentalist’s distinct character, creating what Machover describes as an ensemble of soloists. In the third, it is meant to find common ground between players. Specially installed loudspeakers extend those sonic connections beyond the orchestra and into the hall.
Two Media Lab PhD candidates have central production roles. Manaswi Mishra designed and built the AI systems; Ana Schon will handle the complex sound mixing during each performance. The electronic interaction therefore sits within a production that also depends on live human control of the sound.
Machover draws a distinction between musical responsiveness and musical understanding. Speaking to MIT News, he said current AI can detect significant audio features and patterns, but is less capable at analyzing performance and expressive intent than earlier systems he developed for Yo-Yo Ma. He nevertheless sees the newer tools as a source of surprising musical exchanges.
My biggest wish is that people listen to this piece as music — forget about the AI or the story and just get swept along.
Tod Machover, speaking to MIT News
Machover uses the orchestra as a model of people negotiating their relationships. The balance between written instructions and freedom, and between musicians and conductor, forms part of the story. Each movement presents a different stage of democratic strain or renewal:
For listeners who prefer a musical thread to a political one, Machover offers a melody to follow. It struggles to emerge in the first movement, appears in fragments in the second, and becomes central in the third. He hopes audiences leave with some of it in their heads—a concrete listening cue alongside the work’s technological and democratic ambitions.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain whether knowing how the music was made changes your judgment.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.