Research investigation R1016 / claim audit

Five of eight Claude circuit comparisons are specification-matched on paper

The supplied evidence supports five specification-matched comparisons, including bounded numerical approximations. The remaining comparisons require qualifications about permitted failures or comparator provenance; no single equal-guarantee improvement describes all eight tasks.

Current public editionOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026
Verified observations
0

0 measured fields

Supported claims
10

10 material findings

Cited sources
8

8 primary or authoritative

Research score
82

Automated topic and evidence score

Interactive figureFive of eight Claude circuit comparisons are...
CSV JSON
Data statusAwaiting verified observations

The bounded sample is the eight tasks in preprint v1 and its cited baselines published by the original cutoff. Saved evidence recovery does not extend that cutoff. The supplied material supports a specification audit, not independent circuit execution, proof checking or a universally applicable ranking.

Verified observationNo chart values are being inferredLast updated Oct 16, 2026
Coverage note

The bounded sample is the eight tasks in preprint v1 and its cited baselines published by the original cutoff. Saved evidence recovery does not extend that cutoff. The supplied material supports a specification audit, not independent circuit execution, proof checking or a universally applicable ranking.

Dataset ID
spd:claude-s-quantum-circuit-gains-which-comparisons-match-accuracy-and-input-assumptions-dc5a0d66
Stable URL
/research/claude-s-quantum-circuit-gains-which-comparisons-match-accuracy-and-input-assumptions-dc5a0d66
Version
Live
Coverage
Live collection
Records
0
Fields
7
Updated

Read the data

The records behind the figure

CSV JSON
Five of eight Claude circuit comparisons are specification-matched on paper data records
EntityMetricValueUnitObservedSourceTransform

Measurement technique

How to read this report

  1. 01Synthesize the supplied claim ledger and source descriptions; do not treat recovery of saved evidence as a new collection or experiment.
  2. 02Plan an evidence_matrix with one row per task and columns for input domain, operation and interface, numerical tolerance, permitted failure, comparator provenance, reported resource gain, classification and unresolved conditions.
  3. 03Distinguish specification-matched approximation from exact compiled computation, and distinguish either from exact scientific modeling.
  4. 04Retain reported TQ improvements as attributed results rather than recalculating resource ratios from absent underlying tables.
  5. 05Use preprint v1 and the cited baseline versions within the original October 16, 2026, 20:31:05.808 UTC cutoff. Flag supplied snapshots retrieved at 20:32:14.121 UTC as post-cutoff retrievals; live repository documentation is corroboration, not a verified cutoff snapshot.

Sources

Evidence

2 publishers supporting 0 records. Expand a publisher to inspect its cited pages.

Next report / 01AI Model Economics Index All research reports
YOUR READING SPACE

Notifications