Climate activists disrupt Seattle AI Week over data-center growth
Protesters demanded construction pauses and a stronger public voice. State officials defended existing safeguards, while organizers said future events would remain open.
Loading page…
Protesters demanded construction pauses and a stronger public voice. State officials defended existing safeguards, while organizers said future events would remain open.
Listen to this story
At Seattle AI Week’s Oct. 26 kickoff, activists used an interruption inside and a kayak banner outside to press for data-center construction pauses, tighter state AI rules and public input on energy policy. The dispute put Washington’s effort to grow its AI economy against concerns about electricity, water, gas infrastructure and corporate influence. State officials cited existing chatbot and environmental safeguards, while business leaders warned that restrictive policies could push companies elsewhere; organizers say future events will remain open.
Ten kayakers from Climate Defiance, Oil and Gas Action Network and Troublemakers carried a “Power for people, not for tech” banner.
Protesters sought construction moratoriums, strict state AI rules and public input, while also opposing proposed natural-gas pipeline expansions.
A University of Washington analysis counted 577 Seattle-area AI companies in 2025, ranking the region fifth nationally; CBRE placed Seattle second for AI talent.
Climate activists interrupted Seattle AI Week’s October 26 opening at Pier 70, confronting a state official over technology companies’ influence while kayakers protested outside. The confrontation brought demands for data-center moratoriums into an event promoting the region’s AI economy. Organizers said the disruption would not change their commitment to keeping future events open, The Seattle Times reported.
Three demonstrators disrupted panel discussions at AI House, a gathering space for startups and others working in artificial intelligence. Their target included Beau Perschbacher, a senior policy adviser to Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson, who appeared alongside OpenAI’s Mattie Zazueta. OpenAI was also the event’s presenting sponsor.
Roberta Sam, a Climate Defiance member and the first demonstrator to speak, challenged the state’s ties to the industry. Protesters argued that officials’ participation alongside technology executives reflected corporate influence over government, which they blamed for preventing regulation. Sam accused data-center expansion of damaging both the environment and the economy.
Outside, 10 demonstrators in kayaks held an orange banner reading “Power for people, not for tech.” The paddlers represented Climate Defiance, Oil and Gas Action Network and Seattle-based Troublemakers. Their demands extended beyond electricity and water consumption: they also opposed proposed natural-gas pipeline expansions expected to support power generation.
The groups sought construction moratoriums and strict state AI rules, with the public having as much say as industry. That made the protest a challenge to who shapes policy, not simply an objection to a particular facility.
Industry speakers offered a different account of what Washington stood to gain—or lose. Ascend founding partner Kirby Winfield described Seattle as a top-tier startup ecosystem. He pointed to a CBRE ranking placing Seattle second for AI talent and to the presence of Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure.
A University of Washington analysis presented another measure of that base: 577 AI companies operated in the Seattle area as of 2025, placing it fifth nationally by company count. Researcher Suresh Kotha said investment was spread broadly enough that the regional AI economy did not depend on a single company.
Former Gov. Christine Gregoire, now leading the business group Challenge Seattle, warned that other states wanted to lure Washington companies away. She praised the state’s technology and innovation strengths but criticized its business environment. Her argument framed policy as a risk to regional competitiveness, while protesters pressed for stronger restrictions.
People care enough to want to come together and talk and disagree and figure this out
Joe Braidwood, founder and CEO of Glacis Technologies, speaking to The Seattle Times
Perschbacher answered the demonstrators by pointing to chatbot regulations approved earlier in 2026 and Washington’s environmental laws. He called environmental concerns about data centers “legitimate,” but did not address the pipeline proposals before conference staff escorted the demonstrators away.
Electricity supply also drew attention in the panel discussion. According to GeekWire’s coverage, summarized by The Cool Down, Perschbacher acknowledged data centers’ significant electricity use and the challenge of meeting demand alongside electric vehicles and heat pumps. On water, he said a state review found consumption was not out of line with a typical industrial user.
During a later panel, state Sen. Marko Liias argued that communities should receive energy before data centers when supplies become scarce. GeekWire also reported that he wanted facilities to add clean energy to the grid, reuse water and abandon nondisclosure agreements that keep communities uninformed.
The initial interruption drew scattered boos from the roughly 200 attendees. But Nick Ellingson, vice president of innovation and entrepreneurship at the Washington Technology Industry Association, which hosted AI Week, said discussion and debate were the point. The activists said they each bought a $100 ticket; Ellingson said the disruption would not change plans to keep future events open.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain where you would draw the line between debate and disruption.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.