Four-hour batteries cheaper than open-cycle gas turbines in 43 markets, study finds
The Wood Mackenzie comparison covers open-cycle turbines, a type favored by data-center developers. Rising equipment prices and long procurement queues are adding pressure to the gas option.
Listen to this story
The audio brief
Story brief
3 key pointsWith AI-data-center buyers bidding up turbine prices and open-cycle units taking two to four years to procure, Wood Mackenzie’s comparison identifies four-hour battery storage as the lower-cost option in all 43 surveyed markets. The result is specific to storage versus open-cycle gas turbines, not a claim that batteries beat every gas plant or can meet every facility’s needs. The consultancy expects battery costs to keep falling as turbine electricity costs rise, potentially changing the economics of peaking power.
- 01
Open-cycle turbine procurement now takes two to four years; waitlists for closed-cycle turbines extend into the early 2030s.
- 02
Wood Mackenzie forecasts that four-hour battery costs in the Middle East and Africa will fall 33% by 2035, undercutting gas peaking power across the region’s gas markets.
- 03
The report separately finds solar is the cheapest source of new power in every surveyed market; that is a generation comparison, not a storage ranking.
AI data-center developers are driving up prices for gas turbines, but a new Wood Mackenzie report points to a cheaper alternative for the type many favor. Four-hour battery storage costs less than open-cycle gas turbines in all 43 markets surveyed, across every continent, according to TechCrunch’s account of the findings.
The gas option is getting more expensive
The buying rush is part of the comparison’s immediate relevance to AI infrastructure. TechCrunch reports that developers have been purchasing available gas-turbine models, pushing equipment prices higher. The pressure has been especially acute for open-cycle turbines, which are more readily available than closed-cycle equipment.
That relative availability comes with a tradeoff: open-cycle turbines are less efficient and more expensive to operate. Utilities often use them as peaking plants—generators that supply electricity during periods of high demand. Higher turbine prices can therefore raise utilities’ costs, too, rather than affecting only developers building power for their own facilities.
Simpler manufacturing has not spared open-cycle equipment from long delivery queues. Closed-cycle turbine waitlists extend into the early 2030s, and backlogs for both types have been pushing up prices for new natural-gas power plants.
A specific comparison, not every power choice
Wood Mackenzie’s finding is broad geographically but specific technologically. It compares four-hour battery storage with open-cycle gas turbines. It should not be read as a finding that batteries are cheaper than every kind of gas generation, or that this storage duration answers every data center’s power needs.
The report also places the storage finding alongside a separate generation comparison: solar is the cheapest form of new power in every market surveyed. The two findings concern different categories—battery storage and new electricity generation—rather than a single ranking of interchangeable power sources.
The consultancy expects the gap to widen
Wood Mackenzie forecasts that electricity costs from batteries will keep falling, while those from gas turbines will rise over the coming decades.
In the Middle East and Africa, the consultancy expects four-hour batteries to become 33% cheaper by 2035, displacing gas peaking power on cost across the region’s gas markets.
Sources
- techcrunch.comBatteries are now cheaper than natural gas turbines used at many data centers | TechCrunch
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.