Tomorrow Together starts $1.1 million effort to shape Democrats’ AI message for 2028
The group is betting that demands for AI guardrails can win votes, though some Republicans are also distancing themselves from Trump’s pro-industry stance.
Loading page…
The group is betting that demands for AI guardrails can win votes, though some Republicans are also distancing themselves from Trump’s pro-industry stance.
Listen to this story
Tomorrow Together is adding voter research to its effort to make AI regulation a Democratic campaign issue, after spending heavily on candidates who supported tighter rules. The $1.1 million project will study both public attitudes and how Democrats should talk about AI ahead of 2028; its results could inform party messaging as leaders see an opening against President Trump’s pro-development stance. The group also wants to be ready to respond if AI incidents worsen, though its program chief said that possibility is uncertain.
Tomorrow Together spent $6.5 million backing midterm candidates who called for more AI regulation.
Democratic data analyst David Shor said voters from both parties support regulation, suggesting the issue may reach beyond Democratic voters.
Maddie Kriger said more serious AI incidents in the next year are possible, not certain, and the group wants to be prepared.
Tomorrow Together is starting a $1.1 million research effort to help Democrats address voters’ concerns about artificial intelligence before the 2028 presidential election. Announced November 12, 2026, the initiative will gather data on attitudes toward AI and how Democrats should discuss it, extending the group’s investment beyond backing candidates who favor tighter rules.
The announcement coincides with Democrats’ two-day What’s Next conference in Denver, where party leaders are celebrating midterm victories and discussing the next presidential campaign.
Tomorrow Together pushed for new limits on AI and data centers during the midterms. It spent $6.5 million supporting candidates who called for more regulation, placing it among the groups trying to counter the AI industry’s campaign spending.
Kriger also tied the effort to preparing to help people if AI incidents become more serious. She said more and worse incidents in the next year were a possibility, not a certainty, and that the organization wanted to be ready to respond.
President Donald Trump has embraced rapid AI development and opposed limits on the technology. Democratic leaders see that stance as an opening to present their party as the one seeking guardrails on AI development.
At the Denver gathering, Democratic data analyst David Shor described AI as an emerging political issue on which voters from both parties embrace regulation. His assessment points to an audience beyond the party’s own voters.
The political divide is not absolute. Some Republicans have distanced themselves from Trump’s pro-industry position, notably Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Rob Flaherty, a co-founder of the group, nevertheless argued that Democrats had gained the upper hand. At the beginning of the election cycle, he said, voters did not know which party to trust on the issue. He credited Trump with giving Democrats a lead.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain how much public opinion should shape the rules.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.