Policy watch / Verified records

AI Regulation Tracker

See AI rules move from proposal to enforcement.

Structured AI policy actions by jurisdiction, authority, status, effective date, affected companies, and source evidence.

Policy clockRules moving toward effect
1-16 of 23
Each signal occupies the policy clock by announcement date. Color distinguishes recorded status.Hover or focus to inspect
Verified records23
Source evidence31
Named participants48
Jurisdictions15

Maintained dataset

Latest verified ai regulation signals.

Records update as sources arrive. Open any row to inspect captured facts, confidence, completeness, and supporting evidence.

Showing 1-10 of 23 verified records
Sep 3, 20261 source
Minnesota, United StatesMinnesota Legislature, Minnesota Governor, United States federal court
effectiveEffective Jul 31, 2026

Minnesota enacted a law banning the creation of non-consensual sexualized images and videos using AI; a federal judge denied xAI’s motion to block the law.

Details

What we captured

A federal judge denied xAI’s preliminary-injunction request, allowing Minnesota’s anti-nudification law to operate during xAI’s First Amendment lawsuit.

  • The law was signed by Governor Tim Walz in May 2026.
  • xAI filed a First Amendment lawsuit three days before the August 1 effective date.
  • The court denied xAI’s preliminary injunction request on September 4, 2026.
  • Violations may carry civil penalties of up to $500,000.
Sep 1, 20261 source
New York CityNew York City Mayor
announcedEffective date not disclosed

New York City announced a one-year prohibition on student-facing generative AI for public school students through eighth grade and banned AI companion chatbots for students in all grades.

Details

What we captured

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced a one-year prohibition on student-facing generative AI for public school students through eighth grade, along with a ban on AI companion chatbots for students in all grades.

  • The prohibition applies during the upcoming school year.
  • The policy affects about 600,000 public school students.
  • Teachers remain allowed to use AI for instructional planning and operational work, but not grading or crisis management.
Sep 1, 20261 source
New York CityOffice of the Mayor of New York City
proposedEffective date not disclosed

Introduced a one-year ban on generative AI use by students through eighth grade and prohibited companion chatbots across all grades.

Details

What we captured

New York City introduced a one-year education policy banning generative AI use through eighth grade and companion chatbots across all grades, while establishing high school AI-literacy modules and supervised pilots.

  • The policy was introduced by Mayor Zohran Mamdani on September 2, 2026.
  • The ban covers students through eighth grade, while companion chatbot use is prohibited across all grades.
  • The policy includes supervised high school AI pilots involving up to 50,000 students.
Sep 1, 20261 source
New York CityMayor Zohran Mamdani
announcedEffective date not disclosed

New York City public schools ban generative AI use by students below ninth grade for one year

Details

What we captured

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced a one-year policy barring public-school students below ninth grade from using generative AI.

  • The restriction applies to New York City public-school students below ninth grade.
  • The measure is a one-year moratorium, not a permanent ban.
  • High-school students will receive AI education through five separate programs.
Aug 31, 20261 source
G20 member countriesG20 member countries, United States
proposedEffective date not disclosed

Advocated adoption of principles to avoid entirely new AI regulations and focus rules on novel AI situations

Details

What we captured

The U.S. advocated a policy framework under which G20 countries would avoid entirely new AI regulations and address only novel AI situations; Michael Kratsios said China had signed the principles.

  • Michael Kratsios advocated the Carolina Principles at a G20 technology meeting in North Carolina.
  • The principles call for avoiding entirely new AI regulations and focusing on novel situations.
  • Kratsios said China had signed the principles but did not provide the document.
Aug 31, 20261 source
New York City, New York, United StatesNew York City Department of Education
proposedEffective date not disclosed

Plans to prohibit student-facing generative AI and AI tutoring software for students in 2-K through eighth grade and restrict classroom AI use in high school.

Details

What we captured

New York City Public Schools plans to prohibit student-facing generative AI and AI tutoring software for students in 2-K through eighth grade and restrict high-school use to supervised applications and approved pilots.

  • The policy was described in official New York City Public Schools slides obtained by the New York Daily News.
  • The planned ban covers nearly 600,000 students.
  • High-school use would require teacher supervision and be limited to specified educational purposes and five approved pilots.
Aug 31, 20261 source
G20United States government, U.S. Department of Commerce
proposedEffective date not disclosed

Urge G20 members to adopt the Carolina Principles and avoid creating new AI regulatory organizations

Details

What we captured

The United States plans to urge G20 members to adopt the Carolina Principles, reserve new AI rules for novel considerations, and avoid establishing new organizations to regulate AI development.

  • Michael Kratsios is expected to present the U.S. position at a G20 meeting in North Carolina.
  • The proposed principles would reserve new AI regulation for novel considerations.
  • The United States also plans to oppose creating new regulatory organizations for AI development.

Source evidence

Confidence 94% / Completeness 95%

Aug 31, 20261 source
Eatonville, Florida, United StatesEatonville Town Council
proposedEffective date not disclosed

Consider an amendment increasing daily penalties for missed data-center milestones and authorizing the town to withhold the final certificate of occupancy until site commitments are met

Details

What we captured

Eatonville’s town council is considering an amendment to raise delayed-milestone fines to $500 per day and make withholding the final certificate of occupancy legally binding until HostDime meets specified site, safety, utility, water, and sound requirements.

  • The proposed daily penalty is $500.
  • The amendment would permit withholding the final certificate of occupancy.
  • The facility is a $100 million, 100,000-square-foot AI-ready data center.
  • HostDime expects full opening in the third quarter of 2026.
Aug 31, 20261 source
G20 member statesUnited States government, G20 governments
proposedEffective date not disclosed

The United States will seek G20 governments' commitment to avoid creating new regulatory bodies for artificial intelligence.

Details

What we captured

The United States plans to promote the Carolina Principles at a G20 ministerial meeting, including a proposed commitment for governments not to create new AI regulatory bodies.

  • The proposal is called the Carolina Principles.
  • The proposal is being advanced during the United States' 2026 G20 presidency.
  • The article does not report that the commitment has been adopted or made legally binding.

Source evidence

Confidence 86% / Completeness 95%

Aug 31, 20261 source
G20White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, US Department of Commerce
proposedEffective date not disclosed

The United States is seeking G20 agreement to the Carolina Principles, which would commit governments to avoid creating new AI regulatory bodies.

Details

What we captured

The United States will seek G20 backing for the Carolina Principles, a proposed policy commitment discouraging governments from creating new AI regulatory bodies.

  • The Chapel Hill G20 meeting is organized by OSTP Director Michael Kratsios and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
  • The Carolina Principles would discourage the creation of new government bodies specifically intended to regulate AI.
  • The US is framing its 2026 G20 presidency around limiting regulatory burdens and promoting new technologies.

Source evidence

Confidence 91% / Completeness 95%