Australia urges Parliament to pass chatbot safety duties and undercover checks
An October 27 speech makes the case for mandatory safeguards and stronger enforcement. The bill would cover AI chatbots, games and social media.
Loading page…
An October 27 speech makes the case for mandatory safeguards and stronger enforcement. The bill would cover AI chatbots, games and social media.
Listen to this story
Australia’s proposed rules would put online safety duties into product design: covered services would have to assess risks and address harmful features, while users could choose between recommended feeds and content from accounts they follow. Introduced October 20 and promoted in a government speech October 27, the bill is not yet law; noncompliance could draw penalties of up to A$109.2 million. It would also give eSafety undercover compliance powers and consolidate 17 industry codes into one legislative framework.
For under-18s, proposed safeguards cover eating-disorder promotion, hostility toward women, pornography, dangerous stunts, bullying and sleep-disrupting addictive features.
Broader protections would cover child sexual abuse material, grooming, sexual violence, extreme violence, terrorism, serious threats and harassment.
eSafety could issue removal notices for apps and websites designed or predominantly used to generate fake nude material of people.
Australia’s government urged Parliament to pass its Digital Duty of Care Bill in a speech published October 27, 2026, arguing that technology companies have repeatedly failed to make their products safe. The speech outlined mandatory safeguards for AI chatbots, games and social media, plus powers for the eSafety Commissioner to go undercover to check compliance.
The bill was introduced on October 20; the safety duties remain proposed legislation. Services that fail to comply could face penalties of up to A$109.2 million. The government’s argument is that responsibility for safe services belongs with providers, not children or parents.
Companies would have to assess risks in their services and put systems in place to address harmful features. The speech compares this with safety standards for cars, food and children’s toys. For under-18s, the proposed protections include safeguards against:
The bill would also protect minors from addictive features that keep them awake and cause lost sleep. The speech calls stories of people identifying a chatbot as their best friend a warning to Parliament.
This is not about preventing mean comments or political debate. It is about preventing serious harm.
Australian government speech published on pm.gov.au, October 27, 2026
Social media services would also have to let users choose between algorithm-recommended feeds and content from people and pages they follow. Consultation on that rule, called My Feed, My Way, was open when the bill was introduced. Broader protections would cover all Australians against material promoting child sexual abuse, grooming, sexual violence, extreme violence and terrorism, alongside seriously harmful threats and harassment.
Providers’ response window for cyberbullying complaints would fall from 48 hours to 24 hours. The reforms would also allow eSafety to issue removal notices for apps and websites designed or predominantly used to generate fake nude material of people.
The government also wants to consolidate 17 existing industry-made codes into one legislative framework. The speech argues that the codes’ complexity and contradictions have made them difficult to enforce and easy for companies to evade.
Loading discussion...
Join the conversation
Explain where safety rules should end and personal choice should begin.
Be the first to share a perspective or an experience.
Reader comments
Newest comments first. Replies stay oldest first.