Daily issuepublished

Harvard puts AI professors in a $699 bootcamp

OpenAI is testing a web standard for agent-ready sites, while MIT finds chatbot help can weaken unaided judgment.

By 9 min read
Harvard puts AI professors in a $699 bootcamp

The audio edition

Listen to this newsletter

About 3:32
0:003:32
Read transcript
Harvard Business School is turning faculty expertise into a rehearsal layer for startup founders. Its HBS Foundry bootcamp puts AI versions of seven volunteer professors into an eight-week program costing $699. Founders can repeatedly practice investor pitches, sales calls, and board meetings with those avatars before taking the real conversation to investors, customers, or directors. The design is deliberately narrower than replacing a professor. The bootcamp is not an HBS degree program and offers no academic credit. It combines the avatars with live expert sessions, then culminates in an opportunity to pitch investors for $100,000. Harvard says 760 founders have participated so far, including people who may not have access to major innovation networks. The participating faculty members were involved in interviews, recording sessions, testing, and continuing feedback. That matters because the avatars are meant to reflect specific expertise, including venture capital, business-model design, board dynamics, and startup strategy. Professor Shikhar Ghosh says the goal is to help founders arrive better prepared, so scarce live time can focus on questions that require human judgment and conversation. That division of labor is the real product. The avatar supplies repetition and faculty-modeled challenge; the live expert supplies accountability, context, reputation, and care. It can make practice more accessible, but it does not turn simulated feedback into a credential—or into final authority over a founder’s company. Harvard is effectively testing whether AI can make human judgment more valuable by reserving it for the moments that matter most. That same boundary between assistance and authority appears in Sam Altman’s latest warning. In an interview with David Senra, the OpenAI CEO said AI power could become concentrated among too few companies or individuals, and argued that people should retain meaningful control over the technology’s direction. He also acknowledged that his expectation of rapid disruption after GPT-4 was early. Adoption is slower because companies must rework software, data access, compliance, budgets, and roles. For builders and investors, that points to a longer implementation cycle—but potentially more small businesses as AI lowers the cost of starting one. And the question of what users retain is central to an MIT Media Lab study led by Pattie Maes. With chatbot help, participants were initially 21 percent better at spotting fake news. By week four, they were 15 percent worse than before the study when working unaided. Direct-answer systems were associated with greater reliance, while Socratic, question-based systems were associated with stronger later independent performance. Roughly a quarter of participants felt more capable despite that decline—a warning that satisfaction can measure reduced effort, not retained judgment. Finally, OpenAI is testing whether agents can act more directly without surrendering the user’s context. Its ten-day WebMCP Challenge promotes an experimental standard that lets websites expose named JavaScript functions with typed inputs, so an agent can call a tool inside an existing browser session instead of guessing through the interface. The idea has support from partners including Chromium, Cloudflare, Shopify, Vercel, Render, and Netlify, but it is not deployment-ready: Chrome 146 requires a developer flag, and Firefox, Safari, and Edge had not shipped implementations. Across these stories, watch for systems that scale practice and execution while deliberately preserving the human capabilities—judgment, control, and independent skill—that adoption can otherwise erode.
OpenAI is testing a web standard for agent-ready sites, while MIT finds chatbot help can weaken unaided judgment.
Daily issue / The Wednesday Workbench Wednesday, August 26, 2026
Our tools Superpower ChatGPT/WFH.team/Snipman

Today's briefing

What matters today

Inside today's briefing
01
02
03
04
Harvard Uses 7 AI Faculty Avatars in a $699 Founder Bootcamp, While Keeping Live Advice Human

Lead story / platform shift

Harvard Uses 7 AI Faculty Avatars in a $699 Founder Bootcamp, While Keeping Live Advice Human

Read full story  ↗
Altman Warns AI Power May Concentrate as He Revises Disruption Timeline

platform shift

Altman Warns AI Power May Concentrate as He Revises Disruption Timeline

Continue reading  ↗
MIT Study Finds Chatbot Help Can Erode Fake-News Detection Without AI

benchmark

MIT Study Finds Chatbot Help Can Erode Fake-News Detection Without AI

Continue reading  ↗
OpenAI’s 10-Day WebMCP Challenge Pushes Websites to Expose Tools for AI Agents

platform shift

OpenAI’s 10-Day WebMCP Challenge Pushes Websites to Expose Tools for AI Agents

Continue reading  ↗
Apple Refreshes Mac mini and Mac Studio for Linked Local AI, From $899

platform shift

Apple Refreshes Mac mini and Mac Studio for Linked Local AI, From $899

Continue reading  ↗
The Wednesday Workbench themed section header

Five tools for private-company research, security review, internal-agent oversight, AI sales agents, and user onboarding.

Beijing Humanoid Games Put Practical Work to the Test; Only 3 of 12 Finish Fire Course Beijing Humanoid Games Put Practical Work to the Test; Only 3 of 12 Finish Fire Course ↗viral
OpenAI Adds $100-Annual ChatGPT Business Seats With 5x Usage for Heavy Users OpenAI Adds $100-Annual ChatGPT Business Seats With 5x Usage for Heavy Users ↗launch
From our network. Tools built for the way you work. Useful products from the team behind Superpower Daily.

Reader check-in

Help shape tomorrow's briefing

One click tells us what to keep, improve, or tighten.

Prefer one email a week? Get the essential AI moves in the Sunday Weekly Digest.